December 16, 2009

Supreme Court tells Birthers "No harm from unconsitutional Conduct'

According to the SCOTUS, the rejection for reviewing the Original Certificate in the Vault and was not provided as asked of Obama by the Court.  However, the ruling stated that 'unconstitutional misconduct does not provide personal injury and therefore proving the President as being a Citizen does not rise to the level of Jurisprudence to honor complaint.'
The ruling is what has my crawl.  President Obama most likely is American, but for the Court to say that unconstitutional conduct harms no one.  Then exactly what does the Oath of Office mean to protect it.  That means whenever confronted, not when it pleases the Court to entertain, does it?
Here is a post on the Court Ruling and the birth certificate.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please be patient on comment approval. Too many places to be. Thanks for your thoughts.