August 13, 2021

Mike huckabee~ "Shhh!!" The most underreported story: Day 3 WRAP-UP

August 13, 2021

Good morning!

Blessings on you and your family, and from all the Huckabee staff!

Today's newsletter includes:

Bible Verse of the Day - Colossians 4:2
"Shhh!!" The most underreported story: Day 3 WRAP-UP
The Taliban Continues To Advance
America The Beautiful
A Glimpse Of The Truth About Our Southern Border
Drama In The House

Thank you again for subscribing! To read this newsletter on my website, go here .

Sincerely,

Mike Huckabee

P.S. If you need to change the email address for your subscription, please go to my website here.

DAILY BIBLE VERSE

2 Continue in prayer, and watch in the same with thanksgiving;

Colossians 4:2

"Shhh!!" The most underreported story: Day 3 WRAP-UP

By Mike Huckabee

"There are so many ways to defeat a legitimate ballot." That's the first big take-away from Mike Lindell's election integrity symposium held this week in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Experts clearly showed the combination of factors making election outcomes vulnerable and open to question, potentially leading a targeted candidacy to "death by a thousand cuts."

There should be agreement at this point that electronic voting systems are NOT guaranteed secure. I'm not a cyber expert, but it sure looks as though these systems can indeed be connected to the internet and hacked by any geek who knows how. Anyone who says there's "no evidence" of this is either covering something up or willfully blind to the obvious.

Though Lindell must now admit he can't just drop some big bombshell and get Donald Trump reinstated as President --- he got destroyed in the media for suggesting that --- he did bring concerned people together on the critical issue of election integrity. Talk about patriotism and perseverance; Lindell has withstood enormous obstacles to do this.

The media have been savage in their comments, even some on the right. As Brad Slager in RedState.com points out, "the press wants desperately to smear conservatives as conspiracy nutters, claiming that Republicans are hanging on every word delivered by an unknown internet crank [NOTE: I guess he means "Q"?] and an unhinged pillow tycoon." The only people who are really talking about these "crackpot" theories, he says, are on the left, so they can ascribe them to the right. And Mike Lindell, he thinks, has played right into their hands.

https://redstate.com/bradslager/2021/08/12/conservatives-are-obsessed-with-my-pillow-vote-fraud-conference-according-to-obsessed-news-networks-n425337

Repeated hacks from the very start of Lindell's symposium delayed his event and threatened to take him offline. "They took down three platforms --- but I had four," he told the crowd. As I've said, the hackers succeeded only in illustrating the point Lindell was making about how easy it is to hack.

Wednesday, after the symposium, Lindell was assaulted. We have few details so far, but as Jim Hoft reported in THE GATEWAY PUNDIT, he was punched in the ribs at the close of the day. ("I'm okay but it hurts," he said later.) And on Thursday morning, he related another story of heavy-handed opposition, saying that it wasn't just Tina Peters, the Mesa County, Colorado, county clerk, who got raided, but also a colleague of hers, at his home. He was there with his four kids when state officials came a-knocking and confiscated all his electronics, even the kids' computer games.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/08/mike-lindell-opens-thursday-cyber-symposium-shocking-developments-another-home-raided-credible-threats-conference-infiltrated/

Col. Phil Waldren then advised the crowd that Lindell's "Red Team" of cyber experts had begun receiving threats a couple of weeks ago, and that the conference itself had been infiltrated. (Does this surprise anybody?) "We've got [really radical] folks exchanging badges in the parking lot, press badges," he said. "We've identified those agents and provocateurs by photo imagery, validated by their social media platforms. The big end game is to discredit all of the state legislators who are here to listen."

He also told the crowd he had alerted federal authorities to an attempt to insert faulty data into the conference. I'm sure the feds will get right on that.

So, just because voting equipment CAN be connected to the internet, can we determine that it was? One whistleblower, anonymous due to fear of retaliation, brought a photo taken at the TCF Center in Detroit (Wayne County), of a computer used to process absentee ballots at a recent local primary election. Election workers had been instructed to keep all devices in the counting facility on "airplane mode," but when the whistleblower turned that off, several internet connections appeared on the screen. Even if this was some internal network, it still would have been vulnerable to other devices.

Jim Hoft reports that evidence of this phenomenon was also seen in Michigan in the 2020 election, citing attorney Matthew DePerno's observations from June 2021 about how the EMS (election management system) in Antrim County was successfully logged into remotely, at two different times. He called it fraud (as opposed to "human error"), accused officials of lying about it and said the election in Antrim County should be decertified.

Not being computer geeks ourselves, we can't independently verify this claim, but it's just one of so many that I don't see how faith in electronic voting can be maintained. Always, no matter who wins, the other half of the country will refuse to accept that "winner." (One big difference: when the left wins, the media will celebrate; when the right wins; the media will delegitimize.) America as a democratic republic can't continue this way. So electronic systems must be scrapped. Fortunately, some of the experts at this symposium had good ideas for creating a new, secure system in which people can actually verify that their vote was counted as intended.

One of the participants compared this event to the Normandy invasion in World War II. It didn't end the war, but it was the way we started to end the war. There was much more hard work to do.

The next critical step for participants is to find out NOW if the voting equipment back home has already received a post-election "maintenance call" from their friendly, helpful voting systems company. If it hasn't, then forensic copies --- not just back-ups --- must be made, as Tina Peters did in Mesa County. That's the only way to prove that data went missing. Otherwise, it's gone without a trace.

Peters returned Thursday to ask some provocative questions: WHY aren't elections more transparent? Why all the roadblocks and "scorched-earth tactics" such as these raids? ("Children's electronics taken from them last night? What was that?") Somebody seems awfully determined to hide something.

Lindell is one courageous guy. With all the threats, he says, he can't even go visit his grandchildren. At times on Thursday, his voice was almost gone. He pleaded with journalists –- at FOX NEWS especially –- to risk losing their jobs and have the courage to address the issue of election reform. "We need to be heard!" he said.

Some have wondered why he's risking his company. (Unbelievably, Dominion accuses him in their defamation lawsuit of doing this to sell MORE pillows.) His answer is that if this country goes down the drain, he doesn't have a company.

Oh, and someone brought up an interesting point: The majority of people who don't vote but find out someone voted in their names are Democrats. I don't know the source for that, but this is an issue that should unite both parties. And, increasingly, it does, as according to a recent Rasmussen poll, 71 percent of Republicans want forensic audits --- and 55 percent overall do.

There is a national security aspect to this as well, because of foreign interference. But just one U.S. Senator attended, though that person wasn't identified. It was mostly state legislators, who to their credit are enthusiastic enough to have formed a nationwide "Election Integrity Caucus" nationwide. They'll collaborate to present a united front for having election audits in "each and every state."

The Taliban Continues To Advance

By Mike Huckabee

With the Taliban rapidly moving in and taking back control of Afghanistan in the wake of the US pullout, the Biden White House announced that the US will deploy 3,000 troops to evacuate our embassy in Kabul, plus 1,000 to Qatar to help process Afghans fleeing the country with special immigrant visas.

https://www.foxnews.com/world/taliban-takes-kandahar

The Taliban claims to have seized Afghanistan's third-largest city, Herat, and second-largest, Kandahar. With his usual prescience, Biden declared at a press conference on July 8, "The jury is still out. But the likelihood there's going to be the Taliban overrunning everything and owning the whole country is highly unlikely." Of course, he also thought it highly unlikely that illegal immigrants would overrun this country if he reversed all of Trump's border security policies.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/wapo-fact-checker-calls-out-biden-on-for-july-comment-saying-taliban-takeover-in-afghanistan-highly-unlikely

Much like our border, the economy and the domestic oil industry, this appears to be another case in which Biden inherited a stable situation from Trump, promptly reversed all his policies out of sheer political pique and brought on chaos. The article at the link details this, and reminds us that this shouldn't come as a surprise.

https://www.westernjournal.com/70s-redux-biden-takes-us-back-runaway-inflation-embarrassing-embassy-troop-withdrawal/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=empowerconservatives

During his many, many years in the Senate, Biden consistently voted for policies that brought about many of the problems of the 1970s that are suddenly returning, including inflation, dependence on OPEC and the chaotic Vietnam pullout and evacuation of Saigon. He was known for being on the wrong side of every major issue for 40 years, so why not make him President? What could go wrong?

This is why some pundits are starting to refer to his Administration as "Welcome Back, Carter."

America The Beautiful

God's creation is all around us. To learn more about North Cascades National Park, visit its website here .

A Glimpse Of The Truth About Our Southern Border

By Mike Huckabee

I know many of my readers assume that President Biden and those around him have deliberately created a dangerous, wide-open Southern border so that millions of illegal immigrants can stream into the US, then be given amnesty, followed by citizenship, followed by Democratic Party membership cards. In essence, Biden did to our border security what the EPA agent in "Ghostbusters" did to New York City by shutting down the containment chamber. Naturally, top Democrat officials deny all this and insist they're trying to get control of the situation that was under control until Biden removed all the controls.

But every so often, you inadvertently get a glimpse of the truth: even some of them realize how badly they've botched this. Like in this leaked audio of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas talking to border patrol agents and admitting that "if our borders are the first line of defense, we're going to lose and this is unsustainable. We can't continue like this, our people in the field can't continue, and our system isn't built for it."

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/mayorkas-leaked-audio-border

With nearly 213,000 migrant encounters in July alone, up 13% from June, Mayorkas said the federal government's system wasn't designed to handle such an influx of migrants, he's "very well" aware that the sector recently came close to "breaking," and "it's our responsibility to make sure that that never happens again."

So one person in Washington actually knows the obvious truth. Now, how about telling it to his boss?

Drama In The House

By Mike Huckabee

Sens. Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema aren't the only moderate Democrats who are balking at passing the $3.5 trillion spending orgy…sorry, "budget resolution." Nine House Democrats sent a letter to Speaker Pelosi saying they will not vote for the $3.5 trillion bill until the $1.2 trillion bipartisan "infrastructure" bill passes and is signed into law. That's more than the Democrats' slim House majority. Meanwhile, far-left Democrats are threatening to oppose the $1.2 trillion bill unless the $3.5 trillion bill passes first. (To paraphrase Barry Goldwater, a trillion here, a trillion there, and pretty soon you're talking real money.)

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/moderate-dems-pelosi-infrastructure-3-5t-spending-plan-block

As this story puts it, "That injects a strong dose of drama into the process of the House passing the budget resolution, which Pelosi warned earlier this week should happen 'without drama.'"

I think the term "drama" is well chosen because I've seen this particular piece of political theater before. How many times have I heard that "moderate Democrats" were going to take a stand on principle, only to see them all fall into line and vote in lockstep with whatever Pelosi wants? It's not only theater, it's tired, predictable theater.

No matter what you may hear in the media, remember that America will not be safe until these people no longer have control over the House, Senate and White House. So pray for America and work like service dogs to win the 2022 elections.

For more news, visit my website here.

EHT Victorious in Federal Court Case Against the FCC on Wireless Radiation Limits

BET EVEN 5g WILL MAKE IT SO A COLD WILL KILL YOU.

In Historic Decision, Federal Court Orders FCC to Explain Why It Ignored Scientific Evidence Showing Harm From Wireless Radiation

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit judges in favor of environmental health groups and petitioners; finds FCC violated the Administrative Procedure Act and failed to respond to comments on environmental harm.

Today, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in the historic case EHT et al. v. the FCC that the December 2019 decision by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to retain its 1996 safety limits for human exposure to wireless radiation was "arbitrary and capricious."

The court held that the FCC failed to respond to "record evidence that exposure to RF radiation at levels below the Commission's current limits may cause negative health effects unrelated to cancer." Further, the agency demonstrated "a complete failure to respond to comments concerning environmental harm caused by RF radiation."

"We are delighted that the court upheld the rule of law and found that the FCC must provide a reasoned record of review for the thousands of pages of scientific evidence submitted by Environmental Health Trust and many other expert authorities in this precedent setting case. No agency is above the law. The American people are well served," said Dr. Devra Davis, president of Environmental Health Trust.

Edward B. Myers, attorney for Environmental Health Trust, the lead petitioner in the case, EHT et al. v. the FCC stated, "The court granted the petitions for review because, contrary to the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), the commission failed to provide a reasoned explanation for its assertion that its guidelines adequately protect against the harmful effects of exposure to radiofrequency radiation."

"I am very pleased to see that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has ruled that the FCC ignored decades of studies about the potential health harms of cell phone radiation and must adequately review this material before making a decision about new regulations of cell phones," said Dr. Jerome Paulson, former American Academy of Pediatrics Environmental Health Council Chair and now Professor Emeritus of Pediatrics and Environmental and Occupational Health at George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences and Milken Institute School of Public Health. "It is very important that the court ruled that the FCC must address the impacts of radiofrequency radiation on the health of children amassed since 1996." The American Academy of Pediatrics' submission to the FCC called for a review of safety limits to protect children and pregnant women.

In overturning the FCC determination for its lack of reasoned decision making, the court wrote that the commission cannot rely on agencies like the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) if the FDA's conclusions are provided without explanation.

"While imitation may be the highest form of flattery, it does not meet even the low threshold of reasoned analysis required by the APA under the deferential standard of review that governs here. One agency's unexplained adoption of an unreasoned analysis just compounds rather than vitiates the analytical void. Said another way, two wrongs do not make a right," the court wrote.

The court further noted that the FCC failed to respond to approximately 200 comments on the record by people who experienced illness or injury from electromagnetic radiation sickness.

The court ordered the commission to "(i) provide a reasoned explanation for its decision to retain its testing procedures for determining whether cell phones and other portable electronic devices comply with its guidelines, (ii) address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure to RF radiation, the ubiquity of wireless devices, and other technological developments that have occurred since the Commission last updated its guidelines, and (iii) address the impacts of RF radiation on the environment."

Download August 13, 2021 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH TRUST, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION AND UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

The landmark case centers around the FCC's decision not to update its 1996 exposure limits for wireless radiation from cell phones, cell towers, and wireless devices. Environmental Health Trust experts have long argued that the FCC's outdated limits place Americans everywhere at risk, especially in the era of 5G.

In response to the court's historic ruling, Environmental Health Trust and petitioners released the following statements:

Devra Davis PhD, MPH, President Environmental Health Trust, author of Disconnect: The Truth About Cell Phone Radiation, What the Industry Is Doing to Hide It and How to Protect Your Family.

"If cell phones were a drug they would have been banned years ago. 5G would never have been allowed to market. An ever mounting body of published studies — ignored by the FCC — clearly indicates that exposure to wireless radiation can lead to numerous health effects, especially for children. Research indicates wireless radiation increases cancer risk, damages memory, alters brain development, impacts reproductive health, and much more. Furthermore, the way the FCC measures our daily exposure to cell phone and cell tower radiation is fatally flawed and provides a false sense of security."

"Environmental Health Trust submitted hundreds of pages of scientific evidence to the FCC over the last several years documenting the scientific data showing harm, the need for health agencies to create safety limits that protect against biological effects, and the urgency for infrastructure policy that prioritizes wired rather wireless communications to reduce public exposure. While there is a lot of work left to do, today's ruling is an important step in protecting people against the harms caused by wireless radiation exposure. Unfortunately, the telecom industry is now pushing millions of new 5G wireless antennas into neighborhoods and billions of new wireless devices, putting more in harm's way everyday.

"While we celebrate today's victory, we must look forward. Where do we go from here? We need a congressional hearing into how this agency operated above the law to ensure it never happens again. Committing to 5G merely ensures commercial success in selling new devices and cannot bridge the digital divide where many disadvantaged groups lack access to basic technologies. As we detail in EHT's letter to President Biden, the priority for infrastructure should be for wired rather than wireless internet connections. The U.S. needs a federal action plan on the issue of wireless radiation that should be informed by the latest science showing that current levels of radiation can damage human health and the environment."

Theodora Scarato MSW, Executive Director of Environmental Health Trust and a petitioner in the case.

"This is a win for our children, our future, and our environment. The court's decision should be a wake-up call worldwide. There was no premarket safety testing for cell phones or wireless networks before they came on the market decades ago. As the court points out in the ruling, silence from federal health and environmental agencies does 'not constitute a reasoned explanation for the Commission's decision.' This ruling highlights how there has been no scientific review of the full body of scientific research to ensure people and the environment are protected. No federal agency has reviewed science indicating impacts to the brain, reproduction, trees, or wildlife — not the Food and Drug Administration, not the Centers for Disease Control, not the National Cancer Institute, not the Environmental Protection Agency. For decades, each of these agencies has downplayed the health effects of wireless radiation on their public websites. A telecom-financed scientist drafted webpages to be put online by our federal government. When people try to stop a cell tower from being built in front of their homes, they are told by their elected leaders that they cannot consider the issue of health effects due to the Telecommunications Act of 1996. This has to stop.

"We need an investigation of how our country ended up in this situation and a federal action plan to ensure it never happens again. It is imperative that our federal agencies immediately act to protect human health and the environment."

Statement by Cindy Franklin of Consumers for Safe Phones, an organization that was a petitioner in the case.

"The FCC must now admit that its 25-year-old exposure guidelines are bogus. Our federal regulatory agencies are mandated to protect people and the environment from the known biological harm from exposure to microwave radiofrequency radiation. This ruling shows they have failed to do their jobs. The wireless industry can no longer hide behind the FCC's so-called 'safe' exposure guidelines."

Statement of Liz Barris of The People's Initiative Foundation.

"This day is a long time coming! So many people are suffering from the effects of wireless radiation and SO MANY are not even connecting their symptoms, illnesses, cancers, and even deaths to the radiation that is causing it because they trust and believe their government! The FCC failed to respond to ANY of the documentation submitted to them that people are being injured by ALL types of wireless radiation, from cell phones and Wi-Fi to smart meters and cell towers. We need limits, backed by science, that do not harm people or our environment and thus far, the science shows that the only safe wireless radiation is no wireless radiation. Hard wired ethernet connections with plugin portals everywhere for cell phones and internet may be our best bet."

About the Case

In EHT et al. v. the FCC, petitioners argued that the FCC ignored thousands of pages of research and expert testimony showing harmful effects from wireless radiofrequency radiation to humans, wildlife, and the environment when it decided that the 1996 wireless radiation limits did not need to be updated with a full health and safety review.

Environmental Health Trust filed its case in the Court of Appeals with Consumers for Safe Phones, Elizabeth Barris, and Theodora Scarato, MSW. They were represented by attorney Edward B. Myers. EHT's case was then consolidated with a separate case filed by Children's Health Defense, Michelle Hertz, Petra Brokken, Dr. David O. Carpenter, Dr. Toril Jelter, Dr. Paul Dart, Dr. Ann Lee, Virginia Farver, Jennifer Baran, and Paul Stanley M.Ed. Children's Health Defense was represented by attorney Scott McCullough and Robert Kennedy Jr. Evidentiary briefs were jointly filed. Scott McCullough represented Environmental Health Trust, Children's Health Defense, and petitioners in the oral arguments.

Oral arguments were held January 25, 2021, before a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit including Hons. Karen Henderson, Patricia Millett, and Robert Wilkins.

Environmental Health Trust attorney Edward B. Myers previously intervened in the successful case of the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) and several Native American tribes against the FCC. In this earlier case, the court upheld the relevance of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The NRDC filed an amicus brief in the EHT et al., v FCC case as well.

The FCC is represented in-house by William J. Scher, Ashley Stocks Boizelle, Jacob M. Lewis, and Richard Kiser Welch.

Trump Alert: August 12th Update

Statements by Donald J. Trump, 45th President of the United States of America