Trade Wrongly Blamed for Unemployment-Globalization is|Time to pull in the Reigns

When President Reagan provided free trade, we had under a closed border policy set up our tax structure by the most logical way, through the production, management.  Now with open borders American Products are handicapped by 23<% National Tax.  How can we continue to survive on service jobs?  If you don't create, you lose, what did you say one job of production affects 30 others?  Imagine the jobs selling American products if the tax is of equity. 

 

My thoughts as this happened in the 80's and 90's, was that the Planetary architects were drawing down on the huge vastness of American Enterprise to feed to growth of Capitalism around the World, thus making for our currency becoming the World Currency by default. 

 

We are near the end of the road that this crippling production tax effect on our National economy, once the envy of the World.  It can be again if we but return to our roots, truth and honesty achieved by obeying Law fundamentally and amending when appropriate. 

 

FairTax.org please, for trade is to blame for the most part.  We have been being globalized since at least the Free Trade Policy began.  Time to pull in the reigns.

 

R. George Dunn

 

***

Trade Wrongly Blamed for Unemployment

November 10, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Import competition can throw Americans out of work. Even advocates of free trade like me will readily acknowledge that fact. And nobody needs to remind the people of Hickory, North Carolina.

On the front page of the Washington Post this morning, under the headline, "In N.C., damage not easily mended: Globalization drives unemployment to 15% in one corner of state," the paper reports in detail how the people of that community are struggling to adjust to a more open U.S. economy:

Chairman Steele comment on Rep. Stupak is called out

Mister Steele, you have revealed a truth of yourself and I call you out on it.  Your comments about Stupak reveal how you are given over to the Health Care Bill becoming Law and that your main concern is whether it contains pro-life or not.  Fact is, the entity which wants this health Care made nationalized also want to tax our carbon, the essence of life. Do you actual think that         such a governmental character as this will be concerned about the abortion Law? 

 

Big Government comes from both parties and we have seen it very clearly of late.  You either blister me on this or get out of the Chair.  Your liberal roots are showing.  Only as the Constitution mapped out our Republic will we stay the course.  Look where ignoring the Law is getting us?

 

ON NY23, why haven't we heard how that position is still not filled and the vote made on HC as being possibly ineffective, especially with the difference being able to be influenced by this one NY23 vote.  Why haven't we heard for cries to call up the HC Bill for another vote?  How can a candidate be sworn in when they are not yet State Certified?  Whose side you on? 

 

 Come on over all the way Michael.  Is it Nationalism or is it Federalism?  If the GOP does not accept Federalism as nonnegotiable, tyranny wins.

 

R. George Dunn

 

Here is the news of your words:

 

***

MICHIGAN RADIO

RNC Chairman Steele Has Words Of Support For Stupak During Visit To Holland

GRAND RAPIDS, MI (Michigan Radio) - The head of the national Republican Party is on a two day tour through Michigan. He's on the west side of the state today and tomorrow he'll be at an event in Macomb....

 

 

U.N. Secretary General telling Senate Committee it must comply with U.N. Mandates

My comment to article below:

 

The President of the U.S. cannot sign any treaty, regardless of what the U.N. thinks it can mandate as authoritative instruction or how legal it thinks it is without approval of Congress.  Also, if the U.S. Constitution does not allow for the powers the Federal Government wishes to exercise in treaty, the Treaty must be ratified by each State and is only attributable to that State, non-binding to the Union.

 

On December 7th, the Global Climate Change Summit will commence to attempt to harness the Nations of the World into an controlling tax on Life via carbon.  The rhetoric of our planet warming up continues, even as the planet shows signs of global cooling.  To this greatest attempt at one world power controlling our basic need, energy, I say NO!

 

R. George Dunn

FairTax Please!

***

 

 

One World Government? Globe may not be big enough.

 

 

By Dana Milbank

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

The New World Order came into being at 4:25 Tuesday afternoon.

It arrived at the Capitol, until that moment the seat of American government, in the form of the stooped and bespectacled figure of Ban Ki-moon, who as U.N. secretary general is the de facto leader of what conspiracy theorists call the One World Government. One floor beneath the Senate chamber, Ban, a South Korean national, took his place behind a lectern bearing the Senate seal and spelled out his demands.

"I would certainly expect the Senate to take the necessary action; that's what I have encouraged the senators," he told reporters as a trio of lawmakers stood at his side. He added an admonition for the chamber to deliver "as soon as possible."

The One World Government has specific requirements, Ban added, namely a "legally binding" commitment to "25 to 40 percent greenhouse gas reduction . . . as recommended by the IPCC, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change."

Uh-oh. A U.N. official standing in the Capitol telling U.S. lawmakers what binding commitments intergovernmental authorities expect from them? Glenn Beck was going to burst a blood vessel.

But the man who orchestrated this putsch by the New World Order, Senate Foreign Relations Chairman John Kerry (D-Switzerland), did not appear concerned by the imagery. He called the secretary general "Your Excellency." ...

...Even Americans who don't come from the grassy-knoll tradition tend not to regard the United Nations with great confidence. A Gallup poll earlier this year found that 65 percent of respondents thought it was doing a bad job, compared with 26 percent who think it is doing a good job. Ban himself is not terribly nefarious, if only because he is unknown. A Wall Street Journal poll found that 81 percent of those surveyed didn't know who he was. The others may have confused him with the Unification Church's Rev. Sun Myung Moon.

Ban's profile could become much higher, and not in a good way, if Americans start to perceive him as meddling in Senate consideration of climate legislation. Even before he stormed the Capitol, Fox News was drawing a connection between global warming talks in Copenhagen next month and One World Government.

"America, if you believe this country is great but you're not really into that whole One World Government thing, watch out," Fox News Channel's Beck warned a couple of weeks ago. His guest, Lord Christopher Monckton of Britain, told Beck that "at Copenhagen, a treaty will be signed that will, for the first time, create a world government with powers to intervene directly in the economy and in the environmental affairs of individual nations." Earlier on Fox News, Dick Morris informed Hannity that President Obama "believes in One World Government." And author Jerome Corsi went on Hannity's show to warn about a One World Government in which "our sovereignty would be subject to the dictates" of the United Nations and other international organizations.

The One World Government was on open display at the Capitol on Tuesday, as international U.N. staffers waited outside the room where Ban spoke to the senators. The secretary general had come with his own world government (armed?) security detail, who stood alongside the Capitol police.

Ban, wearing a gold U.N. lapel pin, unfolded his speech. "Less than a month from now, the leaders of the world will gather in Copenhagen," he said. "They must conclude a robust global agreement," that is "comprehensive, binding, equitable and fair."