November 23, 2010

@jackhoogendyk~ Taxpayers to "bail out" the Detroit Symphony Orchestra?-Core Principles


 
 

Core Principles Logo

Is it Time for Taxpayers to Bail Out the DSO?

As reported in the Wall Street Journal:

 

"On StrikeThe Detroit Symphony Orchestra's 85 musicians walked off the job in late September after negotiations broke down over a proposed contract calling for the salaries of veteran musicians to be cut by nearly a third while new players would start at 42% below the current base of $104,650. Pension and health benefits also would be cut.

 

The players had offered an initial cut to $82,000, but wanted pay partially restored over three years, to $96,600.

 

The orchestra's management contends the cuts are needed as the DSO faces a $9 million loss this year in its budget, after two seasons in which it had deficits totaling more than $10 million. The orchestra has also said it faces rising interest payments on more than $50 million in bank loans. Revenue shortfall has been unusually severe as the auto industry has shrunk, spurring a drop in ticket subscriptions and decline in donations."

 

What is the answer? Taxpayers to the rescue! As reported in Gongwer:

 

"The House is expected to take quick action on a local tax financing package for the Detroit Institute of Arts and Detroit Zoo when it returns from break, but there is talk the chamber could add a third beneficiary: the Detroit Symphony Orchestra.
 

The Senate surprised many when it moved fast on SB 1578 and SB 1579, after previously declining to act on anything close to a tax increase, but the bills are being fast-tracked through the Legislature in general because of the shortened lame-duck session. The House skipped its usual referral of the bills to committee and just put them on second reading.

 

symphony strikeThe legislation allows voters in Wayne, Oakland and Macomb counties to create a new property tax to fund the DIA while increasing the existing levy for the zoo.

But unlike the DIA and zoo, which are owned by the city of Detroit but are run by independent nonprofits, the DSO is an independent body reliant purely on ticket sales and donations.

 

Without a resolution, the DSO expects to run out of endowment money and be broke in two years, according to its website."

 

If you are not from the Detroit area, you may not care bacause this is a local taxing issue. But, you must ask the question, "when will my local zoo, art museum, or symphony orchestra be added to the lame-duck Christmas tree?"

 

Perhaps a quick note of encouragement to Senate Leader Mike Bishop and House Minority Leader Elsenheimer would be appropriate. They are both unlikely to support such a tax boondoggle, but some positive reinforcement would likely go a long way. To send them an e-mail, just click on their names.

BishopElsenheimer

        Mike Bishop          Kevin Elsenheimer

 

Have a blessed Thanksgiving!

 

Regards,
Jack
Gadsden Flag
Safe Unsubscribe
This email was sent to rgdunn@veionline.com by centerrightmichigan@gmail.com.
Center Right Coalition of Michigan | 8607 W R Ave | Kalamazoo | MI | 49009

Obama will try to govern by decree (as cheap dictators do in countries without freedom) in two very important areas


 

From: pdelga03@hotmail.com
Subject: [mikehuckabee-190] Obama will try to govern by decree (as cheap dictators do in countries without freedom) in two very important areas
To: mikehuckabee-190@meetup.com
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 07:43:35 -0500





Home
In this issue
Nov. 23, 2010
Manya A. Brachear: Hospice patient's rite of passage inspires others
Steven Emerson: Federal Judge Agrees: CAIR Tied to Hamas
Nov. 22, 2010
John Rosemond: Parenting 101 in session
Jonathan Rosenblum: You ain't seen nothing yet
Nov. 19, 2010
Rabbi Berel Wein: Emulating Esau
Caroline B. Glick : Facing our fears
Nov. 18, 2010
Tony Pugh: The solution to airport screening uproar?
Thomas H. Maugh II: Scientists revealsurgical procedure for hard to cure hypertension
Nov. 17, 2010
Martin M. Bodek: The Name Maven returns!
Yeganeh June Torbati: Should war re-enactments be 'sensitive'?
Nov. 16, 2010
Dennis Prager: Must the Liberal Mind Reject Sad Facts?
Caroline B. Glick: What the Palestinian Authority buys with your taxes
Paul Richter: Dems, GOPers confounded over White House's Saudi arms deal
Nov. 15, 2010
Jeff Jacoby: Created by God to be good
Edmund Sanders: Can Bibi be bribed?
Nov. 12, 2010
Rabbi Hillel Goldberg: Can a single word make a difference?
Caroline B. Glick: Empowering our homegrown enemies
Wesley Pruden: Obama's grim pursuit of Muslim romance
Nov. 11, 2010
Jane Arraf and Laith Hammoudi: Yet more Iraqi Christians murdered
Duke Helfand: Shift to high-deductible plans raises health concerns
Nov. 10, 2010
Jane Arraf : In Iraq, Christians fear they could be wiped out — like Jews before them
Christi Parsons and Paul Richter: Netanyahu defiant in face of criticism over new construction
Nov. 9, 2010
Warren Richey: White House battles ACLU in federal court over terrorist assassination
Jeffrey Fleishman: Do Yemenis live in a Bizarro World --- or do we?
Nov. 8, 2010
William Weir: Breakthrough in Gaucher Disease
Steven Emerson: NPR's kid-glove approach to Islamists
Nov. 5, 2010
Rabbi David Aaron: Re-thinking the notion of sin and redemption (PROFOUND!)
Caroline B. Glick:We are not for sale
Nov. 4, 2010
Warren Richey: Religious schools, government money? Supreme Court hears Arizona case
Thomas H. Maugh II: Researchers discover areas in human genome that may help find causes of certain disorders
Nov. 3, 2010
Rabbi Joshua Hess: Brett, it's time
Steven Emerson: Two Homegrown Radical Groups Increasingly Operational
Nov. 2, 2010
Caroline B. Glick: The Age of Dissimulation
Frank J. Gaffney, Jr.: Saudi friends and foes
Nov. 1, 2010
Jeffrey Fleishman: A case of bombs and identity theft?
Jeffrey Fleishman: A fractured Yemen frustrates U.S. efforts to weaken al-Qaida there
Oct. 29, 2010
Rabbi Nathan Lopes Cardozo: Faces and face-lifts in antiquity
Caroline B. Glick: What Israel's friends must do after Tuesday's election
Oct. 28, 2010
Rabbi Abraham J. Twerski, M.D.: How to be spiritual, correctly: Introduction, Part II
Deborah N. Cymrot: Finally letting go of Halloween
Oct. 27, 2010
Rabbi Abraham J. Twerski, M.D.: How to be spiritual, correctly
The Kosher Gourmet by Noelle Carter: Cauliflower, curried: A fresh-tasting salad that makes use of just the right amount of spices and oil
Oct. 26, 2010
Michael Feldberg: The unknown story of the Jewish role in building Montgomery and Sheffield, Al.
Shari Roan: New research finds link between smoking, dementia
Oct. 25, 2010
Ricki Hollander: Jerusalem Syndrome: '60 Minutes' is the latest 'respectable' outlet to join Arab Propaganda Bandwagon
Oct. 22, 2010
Rabbi David Aaron: Are you on a spiritual journey or ego trip? (PROFOUND!)
Matea Gold: Muslims fear analyst's ouster will fan hostility

Jewish World Review Nov. 23, 2010 / 16 Kislev, 5771
Obama using executive orders to implement radical agenda
By Dick Morris And Eileen McGann






Printer Friendly Version Email this article
Share and bookmark this article





http://www.JewishWorldReview.com | Does President Obama plan to move to the center in response to his overwhelming rejection at the polls on November 2nd? No way! Instead, he is moving to implement, through executive action, two of the most controversial items in his 2010 agenda — a carbon tax and pollution permit system and a ban on the use of secret ballots in union elections. Through executive action by the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the Obama Administration is planning to effectuate both policies without asking Congress.

Never mind that he couldn't persuade even a top heavy Democratic Congress to pass either program. Or that public opinion polls show massive rejection of both measures. Or that each is a sure job killer by itself — and together, they are even worse. This arrogant, ideologically-driven radical is determined to have his way and the public be damned!
The EPA is currently soliciting public comments for its plan to use the Clean Air Act of 1970 to regulate carbon dioxide emissions. The Clean Air Act, as the name indicates, is designed to fight against pollution — unhealthy chemicals that are belched into the air by smokestacks. It was passed to fight sulfur dioxide, particulates, nitrous oxides and other chemicals that cause human diseases. To use it to fight carbon dioxide — which we all breathe without ill effects — because of concerns about global warming — is a perversion of the law.
Worse, because the Clean Air Act is designed to protect public health by measuring aggregate pollution in each geographic area, it limits economic development in communities where the pollution levels exceed prescribed standards. But carbon dioxide doesn't poison anyone. It makes no sense to ban factory expansion in areas where the nature of the industries is that there will be high carbon dioxide levels (like oil area of Texas and Louisiana). But that's what the EPA plans to do, virtually making economic growth illegal in large parts of the United States.
Meanwhile, Craig Becker, the former chief counsel of the SEIU (Service Employees International Union) — now the head of the NLRB — has secured a 3-2 majority party line majority to repeal the Dana decision which mandates secret ballots in unionization elections. The NLRB will rule that if a majority of workers check off that they want a union on cards then the union will automatically be approved without a secret ballot vote of the entire workforce. Currently, if a majority of the workers sign the cards, a secret ballot vote is then triggered. Frequently, the union loses these elections, proving that the card check off is subject to coercion and bullying. The Democratic majority in the Senate wouldn't approve the card check change so the NLRB is planning to accomplish the same objective administratively, trapping workers into unionization they would reject if afforded the opportunity to vote by secret ballot.
Both the pollution permit/carbon tax and the forced unionization proposals will be job killers. The U.S. has maintained its 25% share of global manufacturing by replacing workers with energy driven machines. In the past ten years, the number of manufacturing employees has declined by 33% but our production has risen by 50%. But automation takes energy — lots of it — by taxing energy, we are eliminating the strategy that has preserved our jobs. And massive unionization of the private sector will also drive out our jobs. Since 1990, unionized manufacturing jobs have declined by 75%. But non-union manufacturing jobs have actually risen over the same period by 15%.
After he lost Congress in 1992, Bill Clinton, too, resorted to executive orders to maintain his momentum as president. With Congress unwilling to pass anything he proposed, the president canvassed the Administration for ideas that could be implemented by executive orders. A very productive period followed during which tobacco regulation, higher educational standards, affirmative action reform, and other key measures were implemented without asking Congress' permission. But Clinton's executive orders were on subjects on which Congress had not voted. They did not contradict the express will of the body. Obama is using the strategy to act in direct defiance of Congressional action. He is passing ideas Congress refused to pass, even when he had huge majorities.
Obama will live to regret these moves. Republicans in the House will defund these actions and insert legislative language making it a crime to spend appropriated funds to implement them. By this strategy, all of the controversial Obama legislation will be at issue during the budget fight — taxes, Obamacare, cap and trade, and card check. The more these issues are inserted into the budget fight, the greater the chances of Republican victory.
So President Obama has not learned the lessons of 2010 and likely never will.





www.sdforeclosureinsider.com