Take Action Immediately!! Democrats: "Protect Pedophiles or We Won't Pay Troops"

> URGENT "HATE CRIMES" PETITION! Please click, sign, and WE WILL FAX
> your personalized petition automatically to all 99 Senators, (saving
> you hours of labor)!
> We've already faxed 190,000 petitions to the full Senate...together
> with Worldnet Daily's 705,000 FedEx petitions, we have sent nearly
> 900,000...can you help reach 1 million? Even if you've signed our
> fax-petition before, you can sign again and we'll re-fax!
> BREAKING NEWS: SENATOR LEAHY HIDES "HATE BILL" IN PENTAGON BUDGET
>
> What do homosexual rights have to do with Pentagon spending?
> Everything, if you're a Democrat trying to hide an unpopular
> "pedophile protection" bill from the American people. On Monday,
> Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) spoke on the floor of the U.S. Senate and
> argued essentially that since he couldn't get 60 honest votes to pass
> the "Punish Pastors, Protect Pedophiles" hate crimes S. 909 as a
> stand-alone bill, it should instead be attached as an amendment to S.
> 1390, the National Defense Authorization Act. Staffers for Senator
> Carl Levin (D-MI) then admitted the homosexual bill could be attached
> and voted on as early as Wednesday or Thursday. We may have just one
> more day to act.
>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>
>
> By hiding the hate bill as an amendment to Pentagon spending, moderate
> Democrats (and all but two Republicans) are faced with a difficult
> choice: either pass the Pedophile Protection Act or STOP PAYING OUR
> TROOPS serving overseas. Faced with a "poison pill" many moderates may
> falsely claim they have no choice but to swallow. We must demand they
> take a stand! We've identified 16 Democrats (plus the new Senator
> from Minnesota, Al Franken), who have NOT YET committed as co-sponsors
> to the hate bill. Unfortunately the two liberal RINO Republicans-In-
> Name-Only from Maine, Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe have already
> co-sponsored the bill.
>
> TAKE ACTION TODAY, RIGHT NOW:
> https://secure.conservativedonations.com/pijn_hatecrimes_wnd/?a=2721

> So let's all telephone today all 18 of these "moderates" (plus Al
> Franken) and ask them PLEASE DON'T ATTACH THE PEDOPHILE PROTECTION ACT
> (S.909) TO THE DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT (S. 1309) and don't punish
> our pastors for preaching the truth. Homosexual rights should have
> nothing to do with Pentagon spending.
>
>
> x
> Blanche Lincoln D- AR
> 202-224-4843
> x
> Byron L. Dorgan D- ND
> 202-224-2551
> x
> Herb Kohl D-WI
> 202-224-5653
> x
> James Webb D- VA
> 202-224-4024
> x
> Jon Tester D- MT
> 202-224-2644
> x
> Kay Hagan D- NC
> 202-224-6342
> x
> Kent Conrad D- ND
> 202-224-2043
> x
> Mark Pryor D- AR
> 202-224-2353
> x
> Mark Warner D- VA
> 202-224-2023
> x
> Max Baucus D- MT
> 202-224-2651
> x = undecided Democrat.
>
> x
> Michael Bennet D- CO
> 202-224-5852
> x
> Robert C. Byrd D- WV
> 202-224-3954
> x
> Russ Feingold D-WI
> 202-224-5323
> x
> Ted Kaufman D-DE
> 202-224-5042
> x
> Thomas Carper D- DE
> 202-224-2441
> x
> Tom Udall D- NM
> 202-224-6621
> x
> Al Franken D-MN
> 202-224-5641
>
>
>
> y
> Olympia Snowe R-ME
> 202-224-5344
> y
> Susan Collins R-ME
> 202-224-2523
>
> y = co-sponsoring Republican.
>
>
>
> But remember, 100 emails = 10 phone calls = 1 fax in political
> capital, since the Senate staffers must handle each paper and
> usually write a reply. So please join our automated fax-petition
> campaign first, and WE WILL ESPECIALLY FAX THE 18 KEY UNDECIDED
> SENATORS LISTED ABOVE (WITH AL FRANKEN AS A FREE BONUS) with your
> personalized petition.
> PLEASE CLICK HERE TO SIGN, AND WE'LL AUTOMATICALLY FAX YOUR
> PERSONALIZED PETITION TO ALL 100 SENATORS, TO OPPOSE AND FILIBUSTER
> THE HATE CRIMES S. 909 AMENDMENT (SAVING YOU HOURS OF LABOR!)
>
> The Senate Judiciary Committee held hearings in late June on Senator
> Ted Kennedy's "Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act," (better
> known to conservatives as the "Pedophile Protection Act") but never
> voted on the stand-alone bill S.909. The bill broadly defines many
> "sexual orientations" requiring protection by federal prosecutors,
> endangering free speech.
>
> *Attorney General Eric Holder linked the bill to illegal immigrant
> rights, but "national origin" is already protected by 1994 law, and
> 75% of Hispanics oppose gay marriage. Holder also admitted Christian
> pastors would not be protected if assaulted by violent homosexuals.
> * Senator Leahy tried to link the bill to a shooting at the Holocaust
> museum, but "religion" is already protected by the 1994 hate-crimes
> bill, and shouldn't be tied to homosexual rights.
> * Senator Feinstein hailed Matthew Shepard's case, but ABC News 20/20
> quotes the lead investigator: "sexual orientation certainly wasn't the
> motive in [Shepard's] homicide.
>
> 547 SEXUAL DEVIANCES TO BE PROTECTED BY FEDERAL MARSHALS
>
> Even if mark-up amendments are permitted (which can be easily deleted
> in conference), the forthcoming S.909 will mirror a House bill H.R.
> 1913, already passed 249-175 along strict party lines, which makes
> "sexual orientation," "gender," and "gender identity" into
> federally-protected classes under the law, and codifies federal
> protection of up to 547 types of sexually deviant behaviors,
> including:
>
> * Incest - sex with one's offspring (a crime, of course)
> * Necrophilia - sexual relations with a corpse, also a crime
> * Pedophilia - sex with an underage child, another crime
> * Zoophilia - bestiality, a crime in numerous states
> * Voyeurism - a criminal offense in most states
> * Fronteurism - a man rubbing against an unknown woman's buttocks
> * Coprophilia - sexual arousal from feces
> * Urophilia - sexual arousal from urine
>
> Attempts by House Republicans to add amendments stating "pedophilia is
> not protected as a sexual orientation" were specifically blocked and
> defeated by House Democrats. Lesbian Congresswoman Tammy Baldwin
> (D-WI) expressed opposition to excluding pedophiles from the bill, and
> Democrats voted with her to strike any child-protection amendment. She
> claimed that pedophiles would not be defined within "sexual
> orientation," but wouldn't put that in writing, and refused to define
> that phrase "sexual orientation," which Congressman Steve King (R-IA)
> said will include all 547 sexual deviances listed in the American
> Psychiatric Association's DSM-III manual of clinical psychoses,
> including pedophilia, so now thanks to most Democrats, child molesters
> will be protected by federal law.
>
> In response on the House floor, Congressman Alcee Hastings (D-FL) not
> only admitted it would, but defended that all 547 psychoses SHOULD be
> defended by this new law, saying, "This bill addresses our resolve to
> end violence based on prejudice and to guarantee that all Americans
> regardless of race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual
> orientation, gender identity, or disability or all of these 'Philias'
> and fetishes and 'isms' that were put forward need not live in fear
> because of who they are. I urge my colleagues to vote in favor of this
> rule."
>
> PLEASE CLICK HERE TO SIGN, AND WE'LL AUTOMATICALLY FAX YOUR
> PERSONALIZED PETITION TO ALL 100 SENATORS, TO OPPOSE AND FILIBUSTER
> THE HATE CRIMES S. 909 AMENDMENT (SAVING YOU HOURS OF LABOR!)
>
> QUOTING THE BIBLE IN CHURCH WILL BE PUNISHED
>
> Not only will sexually deviant behaviors gain legal protection, this
> legislation also lays the legal foundation to investigate, prosecute
> and persecute pastors, youth pastors, Bible teachers, and anyone else
> whose speech and thought is based upon and reflects the truths found
> in the Bible. How will this legislation over-rule the First Amendment?
>
>
>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>
>
>
> PASTORS NOT PROTECTED BY FIRST AMENDMENT
>
> S. 909 broadly defines "intimidation," thus a pastor's sermon could be
> considered "hate speech" if heard by an individual who then acts
> aggressively against persons based on any "sexual orientation." The
> pastor could be prosecuted for "conspiracy to commit a hate crime" or
> for "inciting violence against gays" simply by quoting the Bible in
> church. And the First Amendment won't automatically protect pastors,
> since speech accused of "inciting violence" is not protected, and is
> punishable, under precedent of Supreme Court rulings. In 1993
> Wisconsin v. Mitchell, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a "hate speech"
> law providing enhanced punishments for violent crimes based on racial
> motives as revealed by speech of the accused, (which would now apply
> broadly to punish any "anti-gay motives" in the speech of accused
> pastor "co-conspirators.") But pastor, if a crazy person in your
> audience commits a crime against a heterosexual, don't worry, you'll
> get a comparative discount in your prison time.
>
> IS PRAYER IN JESUS' NAME A "HATE CRIME?"
>
> Any public prayer against the sin of homosexuality could be construed
> as "inciting violence" by easily offended listeners, especially if
> those prayers are offered "in Jesus name." When I served our country
> as a former Navy Chaplain, for example, I was told in writing by Chief
> of Chaplains Rear-Admiral Louis Iasiello, that "any chaplain's
> continued insistence on ending public prayers 'in Jesus' name'.could
> reasonably tend to denigrate those with different forms of faith."
> His policy prohibiting prayers "in Jesus name" was enforced against me
> at court-martial, before it was later rescinded by Congress in 2006.
> But this year I've already been falsely accused of "inciting violence"
> because I quoted verbatim from Psalm 109 in my public prayers, (for
> which secular activist Mikey Weinstein literally requested an FBI
> investigation against me!) Just imagine more anti-Christian
> aggression by law enforcement officials AFTER this hate-crimes bill
> becomes law.
>
>
> IS PREACHING AGAINST SIN A HATE CRIME?
>
> As a former Navy Chaplain who was punished (in writing, three times)
> for quoting the Bible in chapel during optionally-attended worship, I
> know exactly how they'll come after us. The enemies of religious
> liberty will simply declare certain gospel phrases "hateful" and
> "offensive" like my commanding officer who punished me for quoting
> John 3:36 in chapel, and was supported by government lawyers for
> "protecting" easily offended listeners from the "offensive" gospel of
> salvation through Jesus Christ.
>
> Congressman Louie Gohmert (R-TX) agrees with me, saying pastors,
> rabbis, or imams could be charged with encouraging or inducing a "hate
> crime" if they preach against homosexuality. "Every preacher of the
> gospel, unless you cut out parts of it; every imam who mentions
> anything with regard to sexual immorality - they could be pursued,
> and in other countries they have been," says Gohmert. (Congressmen
> Gohmert is my personal advocate, with whom I preached last year at a
> pro-faith rally in Texas...and we both agree the gospel of freedom
> from sin really is "love speech" not "hate speech.")
>
> FREE SPEECH SUPPRESSED IN NORWAY
>
> Hate crimes laws protecting homosexuals from criticism are already
> silencing pastors in Norway, where these dangerous laws specifically
> empower law enforcement officials to prosecute "intimidation" of
> homosexuals. For example, Congressman Gohmert warned "I was talking
> to a guy from Norway who was telling me that people are even afraid to
> say Mary was a virgin, because just bringing up sexuality at all can
> raise problems with law enforcement."
>
> FREE SPEECH CRIMINALIZED IN SWEDEN
>
> In Sweden, Pastor Ake Green received a one-month jail sentence last
> year under a Swedish "hate crimes" law that forbids criticism of those
> who participate in homosexual behavior. The Goeta Appeals Court later
> overturned the decision. The government demanded the pastor be
> punished by appealing the case to the Swedish Supreme Court, which
> ruled the law unconstitutional. Yet here in America, the
> Reid-Kennedy-Obama trio is pushing to pass and enforce this same type
> of "anti-free speech" law, despite their acknowledgment that any such
> enforcement would be unconstitutional in America too. (They why pass
> the bill in the first place?)
>
> FREE SPEECH CRIMINALIZED IN CANADA
>
> In Canada, where "hate crimes" laws already passed, the Alberta Human
> Rights Tribunal actively forbid evangelical pastor Stephen Boisson
> from expressing his moral opposition to homosexuality. The tribunal
> also ordered Boisson to pay $5,000 "damages for pain and suffering"
> and apologize to the "human rights" activist who filed the complaint.
> His crime? In 2002, the pastor wrote a letter to the editor of his
> local newspaper in which he denounced the homosexual agenda as
> "wicked" and stated that: "Children as young as five and six years of
> age are being subjected to psychologically and physiologically
> damaging pro-homosexual literature and guidance in the public school
> system; all under the fraudulent guise of equal rights." The
> Canadian government tribunal ordered the Christian pastor to "cease
> publishing in newspapers, by email, on the radio, in public speeches,
> or on the internet, in future, disparaging remarks about gays and
> homosexuals." (This "re-education commission" reminds me of Big
> Brother from Orwell's 1984.)
>
> FREE SPEECH CRIMINALIZED IN PENNSYLVANIA
>
> Can't happen in America? It already has. In 2004 my friend Michael
> Marcavage was arrested along with ten other Christians (including two
> elderly grandmothers), and charged with violating Pennsylvania's "hate
> crimes" laws, because they carried signs conveying God's love at a Gay
> Pride rally. One member of "The Philadelphia Eleven," Arlene
> Elshinnawy, 75 year-old grandmother of three, was holding a sign:
> "Truth is hate to those who hate the truth," before she was hauled off
> to jail by police officers. They were literally threatened with 50
> years in jail for preaching the Gospel of Jesus Christ on a public
> sidewalk, because it offended gays. That hate crimes law was so
> outrageous it was later found unconstitutional by the Pennsylvania
> Supreme Court, but now Ted Kennedy and Barack Obama want to pass
> essentially that same discredited law nationwide.
>
> Thank you for reading our lengthy analysis. If you've read this far,
> we must agree, so now please forward this content widely to other
> pro-faith friends, and to pastors in all 50 states.
>
>
> God Bless you, in Jesus' name,

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>
> Chaplain Gordon James Klingenschmitt
>
> For media interviews, or to invite "Chaps" to
> speak to your church or crowd, select here.
>
> P.S. Time is urgent! The full Senate could vote any day to pass S.
> 909. Select and sign today, & we will forward your name immediately.
> Please don't wait another minute. Life, Liberty, and Jesus are too
> important to be banned by Harry Reid, Ted Kennedy, and Barack Obama.
>
> Disclaimer: The views of Chaplain Klingenschmitt, who was honorably
> but involuntarily discharged from the Navy in 2007 after facing
> court-martial for praying "in Jesus name" in uniform, (but was later
> vindicated by Congress), are his own personal views, not the views of
> any political party, government, or organization.