This is an eminent Immunologist, listen to him. (Red October)
The Spike protein in the jab causes the same damage in the body as SARS Spike, Why are we doing that? :
Hello world!
3 years ago
September 30, 2021
September 29, 2021
X22 Report: "Ep. 2586b - This Is Not Another 4 Year Election, This About Exposing & Destroying The [DS] System" and 1 more video
| ||
| You're currently subscribed to X22 Report for Daily updates. | ||
| Rumble Inc. | 218 Adelaide Street W, Suite 400, Toronto, ON, Canada M5H1W7 |
If everyone knew all there is to know, they would not do half the things they do, including myself, therefore I must foregive them, including myself.
September 28, 2021
September 27, 2021
Mike Huckabee~ Who edited the Maricopa County Arizona final audit report? We want to know!
By Mike Huckabee~
..."There's something odd about the Maricopa County, Arizona, Final Audit Report. We're making no accusations at this point but would like some answers.
It has been reported that part of the Executive Summary has undergone some editing. A draft that was released by Patrick Byrne before the final presentation on Friday contained this passage:
"In the 2020 presidential election, the margin of victory was only 10,457 votes, a small fraction of the 57,734 ballots with known issues. Again, this is almost 6 times the margin of victory in the presidential race and is multiples of the margin of victory in other races. Based on these factual findings, the election should not be certified, and the reported results are not reliable."
That last statement about certification was apparently edited out of the final report. If that's the case, we would just like to know who was responsible for this change and why they did it, given the accuracy of the statements that preceded it. Do the reported results sound reliable to you? Really?"...
| September 27, 2021 | |
| |
Blessings on you and your family, and from all the Huckabee staff!
Today's newsletter includes:
- Bible Verse of the Day - Nahum 1:7
- NYT reports devastating news to the Democrats' "Insurrection" claims
- "Zero dollars"
- Who edited the Maricopa County final audit report?
- An "inside" perspective on the Durham investigation
- News you can use
- Good news update
Thank you again for subscribing! To read this newsletter on my website, go here .
Sincerely,
Mike Huckabee
P.S. If you need to change the email address for your subscription, please go to my website here.
Advertisement
 |
| |
DAILY BIBLE VERSE
7 The Lord is good, a strong hold in the day of trouble; and he knoweth them that trust in him.
Nahum 1:7
NYT reports devastating news to the Democrats' "Insurrection" claims
By Mike Huckabee
It's hard to believe this came from the New York Times, but on Saturday, the paper reported some news that may be as devastating to the Democrats' "Insurrection!" claims about the January 6th Capitol protesters as the recent videos showing most of the alleged "violent insurrectionists" just milling around taking selfies.
The Times reports that according to two people familiar with the matter, in addition to Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio, the FBI had another informant inside the Proud Boys feeding them advance information. This informant allegedly told the FBI that there was no conspiracy to storm the Capitol, as the DOJ claims. Reportedly, the only violence they discussed was how to defend themselves if they were attacked by leftist agitators.
In addition to this seriously undermining the government's case, the linked article at PJ Media asks if this means FBI Director Chris Wray lied to Congress when he told them the FBI had no informants giving them advance information about the Capitol breach. Sure sounds like a lie to me.
Between this and the revelations of the FBI's role in trying to frame Trump on false Russian collusion charges and covering up horrific sexual abuse of young female athletes by Olympic doctor Larry Nassar, we're starting to see more mainstream voices picking up on the long-festering call by conservatives to reform, or even abolish, the FBI. The Wall Street Journal recently took that stand, and radio host/columnist Howie Carr, who called for the same thing over three years ago, is happy to welcome them to the party.
https://www.bostonherald.com/2021/09/25/howie-carr-abolish-the-fbi-you-heard-it-here-first/
In a premium article at the Epoch Times, Roger Simon also makes the same case for breaking up the out-of-control FBI. Here's a quote worth requoting: "If (FBI Director Christopher) Wray is really concerned about 'domestic terrorists,' he should look in the mirror."
https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-fbi-like-carthage-must-be-destroyed_4013624.html
"Zero dollars"
By Mike Huckabee
Please understand upfront that I mean no offense to aluminum siding salesmen by comparing politicians to them. But I couldn't help but think of the famous promise made by the 1960s "Tin Men" ("It pays for itself!") when I heard the latest desperate attempt by Democrats to sell their $3.5 trillion boondoggle bill. President Biden (or whoever tweets under his name) tweeted, "My Build Back Better agenda costs zero dollars…And it adds zero dollars to the national debt."
This stunner is predicated on one of the Democrats' favorite of many false assumptions: that high taxes don't affect behavior or harm the larger economy. Biden can claim that a $3.5 trillion spending spree won't cost a dime or add to the debt because he also wants to go on a $3.5 trillion taxing spree. But if you really believe that massive tax hikes won't result in rich people moving their money out of productive investments and into tax shelters, jobs moving overseas, reduced hiring and raises, economic stagnation and eventual reduced tax revenues, then you win an economics degree from AOC's alma mater.
Other Democrats took to the Sunday shows to parrot the hilarious "zero dollars" claim, but it was too much even for Nancy Pelosi. When she was asked about the cost on ABC's "This Week," she dodged, "Let's not talk about numbers and dollars" (and she never talks cents), let's remember it's about "values."
Yes, I do remember that an addiction to taxing and spending our grandchildren into bankruptcy is, indeed, a Democratic value. Some of the others are: increasing government power at the expense of individual rights and freedoms, showering tax money on Democrat donors and cronies, and doing everything possible to epoxy their rumps into the seats of power for eternity.
Meanwhile, back here in Realityville, the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget analyzed that bill and found that $3.5 trillion is actually a severe underestimate of its cost. They say it's filled with budget gimmicks, such as shoving costs off onto the states, and that its actual cost over the next decade would be between $5 trillion and $5.5 trillion.
https://fee.org/articles/wsj-biden-plan-s-35-trillion-price-tag-is-actually-a-huge-underestimate/
But maybe Biden just doesn't grasp how big $3.5 trillion or $5.5 trillion is. In pushing his "zero cost" fairy tale, he claimed that the rich can pay more because "billionaires and trillionaires are doing very well." I'm sure billionaires are, but there's no such thing as a "trillionaire."
In a related story, it looks as if the House will be voting on Thursday on the other $1.2 trillon "bipartisan" "infrastructure" bill.
As that story notes, "Although the infrastructure passed with Republican votes last month in the Senate, Republican leadership in the House will be whipping votes against the bill." That won't keep it from passing, since only united GOP opposition in the Senate could stop it with a filibuster. And enough Republican Senators already went along with it to make that unlikely, unless they hear an earful from their constituents.
They seem to think that spending on infrastructure is both needed and popular with voters. Which might be true, but by various estimates, only about 10-to-23% of the spending in this bill is on roads, bridges and other things anyone with a grip on reality would actually consider to be "infrastructure." A truly bipartisan bill would be Republicans agreeing with Democrats to spend money on actual infrastructure to benefit all Americans, not a little on infrastructure and four times more on leftwing wish list nonsense.
Advertisement
| |
| |
Who edited the Maricopa County final audit report?
By Mike Huckabee
There's something odd about the Maricopa County, Arizona, Final Audit Report. We're making no accusations at this point but would like some answers.
It has been reported that part of the Executive Summary has undergone some editing. A draft that was released by Patrick Byrne before the final presentation on Friday contained this passage:
"In the 2020 presidential election, the margin of victory was only 10,457 votes, a small fraction of the 57,734 ballots with known issues. Again, this is almost 6 times the margin of victory in the presidential race and is multiples of the margin of victory in other races. Based on these factual findings, the election should not be certified, and the reported results are not reliable."
That last statement about certification was apparently edited out of the final report. If that's the case, we would just like to know who was responsible for this change and why they did it, given the accuracy of the statements that preceded it. Do the reported results sound reliable to you? Really?
Again, no accusations, just a call for answers. It would also be nice to know what else might have been altered. THEN we might have some accusations…
THE EPOCH TIMES has an updated report on what was presented Friday during the Arizona Senate hearing. It has details regarding the anomalies that were found. Highly recommended reading...
Senate President Karen Fann sent a letter Friday to Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich, calling for further investigation and outlining her concerns about the following:
--- signature verification for mail-in ballots
--- voter roll accuracy
--- security of election systems
--- record-keeping of evidence after elections
Brnovich's office issued a statement that said they had no comment on specific allegations at this time and that they would "thoroughly review the Senate's information and evidence." We'll see.
The recount that was done as one part of the audit found little difference in the vote tallies, but that was just recounting the same ballots over again. Nevertheless, mainstream media reports picked up on that as if it were the only finding, because that's the story they wanted to tell. Sen. Fann said evidence was found of numerous problems that affected tens of thousands of ballots, including laws being broken and chain of custody not being maintained.
Arizona Democrats responded by (what else?) attacking Cyber Ninjas, one of the teams working on the audit. Democrats obviously have no interest in identifying problems and reforming the system, no matter how much of a mess it is shown to be, as long as that system benefits them.
An "inside" perspective on the Durham investigation
By Mike Huckabee
Kash Patel, former lead investigator for the Republican-led House Intelligence Committee, appeared on EPOCH TV over the weekend to talk about the Sussmann indictment. This video provides a concise overview of what we've been talking about the past week and offers additional details as well.
For example, Patel said that Sussmann and Marc Elias were the two top lawyers at Perkins Coie overseeing all legal issues of the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee. Sussmann is not some peon.
He also commented, as we have, about the unusual length of the indictment, saying this is not at all a typical indictment for one count of making a false statement, which might run a couple of pages, This runs 27 pages and is what's known as a "speaking indictment."
Sussmann and Elias brought in "tens of millions of dollars" to handle "everything from election law to campaign finance to any criminal allegations that might come up, to state law..." Indeed, we saw how Elias jetted around to different states before the election with a brigade of attorneys filing lawsuits to change state election laws.
Patel described Perkins Coie as a "behemoth." It had to be one, to handle all the legalities –- and illegalities, ha –- of the Democrats' run for President. These two attorneys also went out and hired "internet research" (campaign dirt) firm Fusion GPS, paying founder Glenn Simpson million of dollars for whatever his team could come up with, including the "Russia" stories. Of course, Simpson hired Christopher Steele. As you and I knew, it all traces back to Hillary Clinton.
Patel laid all this out in a most understandable way, so if you know people who are confused by all the twists and turns, just send them our summary, which includes the link, above.
He noted that opposition research is a normal part of political campaigns, and I can tell you from experience that this is true. Candidates even run oppo research on themselves, just to see what comes up. If they find something that might be an issue, their opponent certainly will.
It was just a few days before the election that the phony Alfa Bank story hit. And Hillary tweeted: "It's time for Trump to answer some serious questions about his ties to Russia." There was no basis in fact here at all, but the tweet included these fake bullet points:
1. Donald Trump has a secret server. [Aside: I know. That was HRC!]
2. It was set up privately to communicate with Putin-tied Alfa Bank.
3. When a reporter asked about it, they shut it down.
4. One week later, they created a new server with a different name for the same purpose.
As we now know, the FBI used this information in its FISA request for surveillance. Sussmann was the one who passed it to them. And then he lied about working on anyone else's behalf.
In examining what happened, Patel did what we like to do, which is to turn it around and ask "what if" the Trump campaign were found to have hired a law firm to research and "find" a connection between Clinton campaign headquarters and the Russian government, created a fake story about the Clinton campaign "pinging" back and forth through a bank to coordinate with the Russians, and released this to the media and the FBI right before the 2016 election?
"That would've been international headline news," he said, and we all know that's true. But it's just the opposite when the CLINTON campaign is found to have done this. The media give it the tiniest bit of coverage possible. But Patel doesn't think they can get away with that much longer.
He noted in this interview that Robert Mueller's special counsel investigation was charged with (among other things) finding out how the Alfa bank story fit in and if there was really anything to it. The House Intelligence Committee was looking into this at the same time and hadn't come out with their report, as they were "just staffers on the Hill," operating without subpoena power, etc. Mueller had sweeping subpoena power and cooperation from law enforcement.
Patel puts this Sussmann indictment together with that of Kevin Clinesmith, whom you'll recall was charged with altering an official record that was used against Carter Page in the FISA warrant to spy on him. When looking at both of these, he sees that together they cover "two big components" of the investigation into the Russia Hoax. The former deals with the phony media campaign, outside the government, and the latter with the phony investigation going inside the government. "So, I think there's a larger conspiracy at play here," he said.
He sees this in the long "speaking indictment" that Durham has filed. Though most of the conspirators aren't named, he's pretty confident of most of those identities, "if not all of them."
"I think he's just started," Patel said of Durham.
IMPORTANT POINT: One thing the media are saying right now is that Durham's investigation has gone on so long, he's coming to the end of his official funding in just a few days and needs to wrap it up. (They wish!) According to Patel, the investigation cannot be shut down because Durham has just issued a federal indictment and this case has to be adjudicated in some fashion, by plea or by trial, which typically takes 12-18 months. In the meantime, Durham gets to continue his work. "So, I laugh at anyone in the media who tells me they're worried about Durham being defunded," he said. "He literally CAN'T, because he's in the middle of a federal prosecution."
It occurs to me that this might be another reason for Durham's under-the-wire timing of the Sussmann indictment.
One concern Patel does have is a potential conflict of interest for the judge assigned Sussmann's case: U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper. His wife, prominent DC attorney Amy Jeffress, is a former top aide to then-Attorney General Eric Holder. She has represented...(drum roll, please)...Lisa Page, who reported to Andrew McCabe and, along with him, is one of the most central figures in this scandal. She worked for FBI general counsel James Baker, who is the one who reviewed the FISA applications, and also teamed (very closely) with Peter Strzok, who led "Crossfire Hurricane"!
I'm sorry, but that big a conflict just will not fly. How did this judge GET the case, anyway?
As Patel pointed out, Lisa Page might very well be a witness in Sussmann's trial. (I would add that apparently there WILL be a trial, as Sussmann has already pleaded "not guilty.") Conflicts of interest can be cited simply over the possibility of such things happening. As wild as it seems, unless the case is reassigned, we could easily have a situation in which a witness in the case has been represented by the judge's wife.
The judge should recuse himself, or the attorney general should reassign the case. But with Merrick Garland at the helm, how do we trust this process?
Advertisement
| |
| |
News you can use
By Mike Huckabee
To help decipher the constant stream of lies, obfuscations and deflections coming from the Biden White House, David Marcus at Fox News has compiled a glossary of Biden Administration euphemisms. Some are already familiar ("Circle back" to a question means "won't answer it now and never will.") Others were new even to me, like "irregular migrant" (what used to be called in the age of more precision an "illegal alien.")
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/biden-doublespeak-glossary-white-house-euphemisms-david-marcus
Good news update
By Mike Huckabee
I hate having to bring you so much bad news all the time (hopefully, that will change after November, 2022), so I'm always on the lookout for some good news to share. And how about this for good news? The Guardian newspaper has a round-up of recent studies that suggest decades of official public health advice may be wrong: steaks, dairy, salt, eggs and other delicious foods may be good for you, while it's processed foods such as low-fat cheese that may be bad for your health.
To cite just one example: a Swedish study that followed 4,150 people over 16 years found that a diet rich in dairy fat might actually lower your risk of heart disease. This reminds me of Woody Allen's comedy "Sleeper," set 200 years in the future, where doctors couldn't figure out why people in our time ate things like wheat germ ("Didn't they know about hot fudge?")
You'll want to read the rest. It's encouraging news, but don't let it convince you to go hog wild on your diet. But it does make you ponder, if recent events haven't already, whether our public health experts have any idea what they're talking about.
|
Blue Diamond Media
Blue Diamond Media P.O. Box 242058 Little Rock, AR 72223
Phone: 1-800-921-4825
Fax: NA
If everyone knew all there is to know, they would not do half the things they do, including myself, therefore I must foregive them, including myself.
September 26, 2021
European Union eliminates COVID PASSPORTS and all COVID Vaccines
They name five effective therapeutic medications!
https://x22report.com/aiovg_videos/dr-zelenko-forget-class-action-lawsuits-there-will-be-tribunals-what-if-cures-already-exist/
If everyone knew all there is to know, they would not do half the things they do, including myself, therefore I must foregive them, including myself.
September 25, 2021
X22 Report: "Dr. Zelenko - Forget Class Action Lawsuits There Will Be Tribunals, What If Cures Already Exist?" and 2 more videos
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| You're currently subscribed to X22 Report for Daily updates. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Rumble Inc. | 218 Adelaide Street W, Suite 400, Toronto, ON, Canada M5H1W7 |
If everyone knew all there is to know, they would not do half the things they do, including myself, therefore I must foregive them, including myself.
September 24, 2021
September 23, 2021
Political Protocol: A puzzle wrapped in an enigma of endless uncertainty with great unyielding tenacity!!!
You must obediently comply or we will compel you!!!
If everyone knew all there is to know, they would not do half the things they do, including myself, therefore I must foregive them, including myself.
September 22, 2021
Mike Huckabee~ Why is Durham taking so long? HERE'S THE ANSWER
| September 22, 2021 | |
| |
Blessings on you and your family, and from all the Huckabee staff!
Today's newsletter includes:
- Bible Verse of the Day - Matthew 28:18
- Why is Durham taking so long? HERE'S THE ANSWER
- Reader comment re: Russia Hoax reporting
- In honor of the memory of Col. Dwight E. Engle
- President Biden addresses the UN
- Pelosi caves to anti-Israel socialists
- This just in
- Pelosi, not big in England
Thank you again for subscribing! To read this newsletter on my website, go here .
Sincerely,
Mike Huckabee
P.S. If you need to change the email address for your subscription, please go to my website here.
Advertisement
| |
| |
DAILY BIBLE VERSE
18 And Jesus came and spake unto them, saying, All power is given unto me in heaven and in earth.
Matthew 28:18
Why is Durham taking so long? HERE'S THE ANSWER
By Mike Huckabee
The fact that Special Counsel John Durham would release 27 pages of detailed narrative to indict one measly person on one count of making a false statement to the FBI got us wondering immediately what his purpose might have been. We're not attorneys, but over the next couple of days, some of our favorite legal minds noticed the same thing.
Over the years, you and I have learned not to expect much in the way of justice from the "Justice" Department --- especially now, with an obvious political hack like Merrick Garland running it --- but the indictment of this Clinton attorney might be the harbinger of bigger things to come. It is likely that Hillary will escape jail once again, as she did even after using a private server to circumvent FOIA requests and destroying evidence with BleachBit and hammers, but remember: even though Nixon escaped legal accountability in the Watergate scandal, the whole story did come out. What we're looking at is probably another situation like that.
For now, many thanks to Dan Bongino for pointing us to a superb analysis of Sussmann's indictment on SUBSTACK by Shipwreckedcrew's Port-O-Call. This is long but important to read.
https://shipwreckedcrew.substack.com/p/the-sussmann-indictment-reads-like
"The Sussmann indictment reads like overt acts in furtherance of a conspiracy," he writes, "because that's what it is."
He explains that the indictment on that one charge is contained in just one paragraph, Paragraph 46, which reads, "On or about September 19, 2016, within the District of Columbia, MICHAEL A. SUSSMANN, the defendant, did willingly and knowingly make a materially false, fictitious and false statement or representation in a matter before the jurisdiction of the executive branch of the Government of the United States, to wit, on or about September 19, 2016, the defendant stated to the General Counsel of the FBI that he was not acting on behalf of any client in conveying particular allegations concerning a Presidential candidate, when in truth, and in fact, and as the defendant well knew, he was acting on behalf of specific clients, namely – Tech Executive 1 and the Clinton campaign."
That's it. That's what he stands accused of. What are all those other pages for? A "false statement" charge doesn't require all that narrative. What Durham filed is called a "speaking indictment," which "discloses information in a public document that would not otherwise be known if the indictment set forth only facts needed to meet the requirements of due process."
"Shipwrecked" says, "In over 30 years of practice as both a federal prosecutor and a defense attorney specializing in federal cases, I've never before seen anything remotely resembling the Sussmann indictment in a single 'false statement' case."
He writes that the facts Durham has alleged probably have at least a dozen "strings" hanging off them. Some of these are legal and others are "more in the 'court of public opinion.'" (See Nixon, above.)
Those who are understandably cynical about the process as it typically applies to Hillary & Co. and dismayed at the length of time Durham has taken to come up with this one indictment should definitely read this analysis. "Shipwrecked" explains why it has taken as long as it has, notably regarding Durham's search for source materials. Some materials he needed to look at could only be sought by grand jury subpoena if they were over six months old. Anything more recent needed "probable cause."
So, what materials was Durham waiting on? At least some of them must have been billing records for Perkins Coie, some of which showed Sussmann billing Hillary's campaign for his work relating to the phony Alfa Bank story. These were absolutely key to the indictment on the false statement. One might imagine that even after being hit with the grand jury subpoena, Perkins Coie put up a huge fight over turning over that information, as it involves attorney-client communications and attorney work product information, both of which would typically be shielded from disclosure to a grand jury.
Perhaps Durham made it clear to Perkins Coie that they themselves could be held criminally liable for their attorney's misconduct, and that they'd better darn well cooperate.
But even if they did, attorney-client privilege applies to clients as well, which in this case include the DNC, the Clinton campaign and "Tech Executive 1." They would have had to waive THEIR privilege for some reason. What might that reason be? This situation suggests to me that they might face some pretty fierce legal jeopardy themselves --- that they knew it could be even worse for them if they didn't cooperate. This is one area that I hope legal experts like "Shipwrecked" will explore in detail.
He does note something called "the crime-fraud exception," which applies when the normally privileged communications relate to a fraud that is currently occurring or might be contemplated by THE CLIENT (as opposed to the law firm) in the future. That would make sense to me, since clients like the DNC and Hillary can't go one day without contemplating more fraud. Perhaps it had something to do with their ongoing anti-Trump activities after he was in office.
But, anyway, if you've been wondering, "Why is Durham taking SO LONG?," this legal fight is one reason why.
Something else of interest: we recently reported that Marc Elias had left Perkins Coie to open his own separate firm dedicated to the Dark Art of getting more Democrats elected to office and furthering the progressive agenda. Sussmann was gone, too, on leave until resigning the day of his indictment. As "Shipwrecked" explains, catapulting these two partners might have been one way that Perkins Coie showed its willingness to cooperate with investigators to save its own sorry hide.
The reason we haven't known about this legal fight is that Durham apparently didn't take it before a DC grand jury. He could keep it quiet by going to any district where he had a grand jury convened. As "Shipwrecked" points out, disputes over the production of documents to a federal grand jury typically take place behind closed doors –- or, in the age of COVID, on a private Zoom call; no travel required –- and are not part of the public docket. All references to the dispute would be sealed,
I highly recommend this article, as it's very clearly written for the non-lawyer and brings up a number of considerations we haven't seen anywhere else. This apparently is the first installment of a series; we're grateful for the insight and eagerly anticipate the next one. The writer mentions as a tease that another "scene of the crime" (that's my phraseology) mentioned in the indictment as being outside the District of Columbia, is likely the CIA ("Agency -2"), headquartered in Langley, Virginia. So this gets more interesting all the time.
LEAVE ME A COMMENT HERE, I READ THEM!
Advertisement
| |
| |
Reader comment re: Russia Hoax reporting
By Mike Huckabee
From Betty F.:
You are one of the few people I still have trust and respect for. I have prayed for someone to have the integrity and tenacity to expose the truth about this matter and bring those who are guilty to justice. Thank you for following this investigation and keeping 'we the people' informed. May God continue to guide you and bless you.
In honor of the memory of Col. Dwight E. Engle
By Mike Huckabee
Please join me in expressing gratitude to a great American patriot who passed away on Friday, September 17. Col. Dwight E. Engle, a native Kansan and veteran of the Air Force with 20-plus years of service, was named after President and Gen. Dwight D. Eisenhower. As a staunch conservative and strong supporter of President Trump, he had expressed dismay at the direction our Great Nation is headed under the current administration. Be mindful that as we fight the good fight to get America back on the right path, we are honoring Col. Engle and all those like him who served our country and cared deeply for its future. They have passed the torch to us. Please keep Dwight and his family in your prayers today.
Advertisement
| |
| |
President Biden addresses the UN
By Mike Huckabee
Tuesday, President Biden addressed the UN General Assembly, but his speech was so detached from reality that he might as well have been speaking to the United Federation of Planets. Redstate.com has a good recap complete with video clips.
Biden didn't mention the border crisis at all. His mention of Afghanistan was to congratulate himself for America no longer being at war (thanks to his supercharging the Taliban, it's likely to be just a pause before the storm.) He talked about "accountability" over COVID, but didn't mention China. He announced his intention to rejoin the UN Human Rights Council, which Trump pulled out of because it's filled with nations that spit on human rights, like China, Cuba, Russia, Somalia, Venezuela and Pakistan. He claimed he'd spent the past months "rebuilding our alliances" (our allies are so furious at him that Britain's Parliament voted to censure him and France recalled its ambassador.)
He also cited the importance of the UN Declaration of Human Rights in protecting rights from being "trampled and twisted in the pursuit of naked political power," which is a pretty good description of what he's been doing to Americans' Constitutional rights from the moment he took office. And at one point, he mistakenly referred to the United Nations as the "United States." I suspect that he'd like to turn the USA into the UN, but this is the first time he's let it slip out loud.
Here's a complete transcript if you're so inclined:
Considering President Biden's performance at the UN, and frankly, any appearances recently, it's no surprise that White House staff are frantic to keep him from answering any questions from the press. But they're taking it so far that even the normally sycophantic White House Press Corps lodged a formal complaint Tuesday after Biden's "press conference" with British Prime Minister Boris Johnson.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/reporters-slam-white-house-aides-shouting-down-press-pool-questions
After Johnson took a few questions from British reporters, White House staffers suddenly interrupted as reporters tried to question Biden and started shouting at reporters to clear the room. A reporter who shouted a question about the border said he thought Biden said something in reply, but with all the noise, Biden's facemask and his being led away, whatever he said was indecipherable. I have a feeling it would have been equally indecipherable if he'd been standing at a podium at the UN. His staffers know that, hence the panicked room-clearing.
Pelosi caves to anti-Israel socialists
By Mike Huckabee
In a move that infuriated both Republicans and moderate Democrats, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi caved in to the anti-Semitic socialists of "The Squad" and cut $1 billion in funding for Israel's Iron Dome missile defense system from a short-term government funding bill. Pelosi can lose only a few votes or the bill won't pass, since Republicans unanimously oppose the bill because they're fighting over raising the federal debt limit.
https://nypost.com/2021/09/21/aoc-squad-force-dems-to-cut-1b-for-iron-dome-from-spending-bill/
I can understand why someone might oppose the entire bill on general principle, but why would anyone publicly hold it hostage over just one provision: not funding Israel's defense from terrorist missiles? Note that this wasn't new or increased spending. It was standard support for our closest ally for a purely defensive weapons system that stops missiles fired by Hamas terrorists (4400 just last spring) from killing innocent Israeli men, women and children. Why would US Congress members choose to take a hard stand on the side of terrorists who are trying to kill Jews? Well, read some of their previous comments, and I think you'll figure it out.
Other Democrats say the funding will be added to a larger defense bill or introduced as a stand-alone measure, and it should pass with bipartisan support. But the Squad's opposition to that one issue tells us a lot about what we're dealing with from them. Michigan Democrat Rep. Elissa Slotkin said the removal of the funding was "devoid of substance and irresponsible." That's a pretty good description of the entire Squad.
This just in
By Mike Huckabee
Facebook and Instagram now define doctors and nurses speaking candidly about what they're personally dealing with in the areas of COVID and adverse vaccine reactions as "misinformation" that must be censored.
Pelosi, not big in England
By Mike Huckabee
Last weekend, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi tried taking her Trump-bashing on tour to England. It did not go well.
|
Blue Diamond Media
Blue Diamond Media P.O. Box 242058 Little Rock, AR 72223
Phone: 1-800-921-4825
Fax: NA
If everyone knew all there is to know, they would not do half the things they do, including myself, therefore I must foregive them, including myself.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
