February 05, 2014
July 23, 2011
The Shadow Agenda - Grinding America down. Only Constitutional conduct and Fairtax can save us now~
It is politically correct to not question where we are seemingly headed, but to accept the Government leadership as pristine. How many of the tin foil conspiracies have turned out true? Too many. Is there an agenda in DC for the New World Order?
Did President Bush's first bailout come about to cover up the fact that the USA was the only Nation to not open their National Bank books to remain in the International Banking Community? Google, BASEL IV for this truth.
Has the agenda since that day been to fast track the NWO take over? What can stop this? Returning to constitutional conduct making the fifty State Sovereignty in all not enumerated to the federal government as their right to power, including values, and enacting the Fairtax to end the redistribution of United States Industry.
Hope is still alive, if we who are silent, stand up immediately. This is that last election of a free people if we do not put the light on this Shadow Government and end it by returning to the Constitution and Sovereignty of 50 Nations in Union, not one with 50 provinces in obedience. Change the tax structure to take all the federal taxes hidden in domestic products and equally harm imports with domestic product with the federal taxation by enacting Fairtax. By doing the latter you lower the former % needed by 90%, but you will not afford the latter without the former funding the transition back to the Constitution with respect to those already invested in the current Federal Entitlements, which can be divested using the Ryan Plan method into privately owned, voluntary or State Mandated, HSA/IRAs to replace all federal entitlements. These HSA/IRAs can be locally invested too. It is a win win, as it honors all, including those yet to be born.
Constitutional conduct and Fairtax please~
December 25, 2009
Democrat hero= Saul Alinsky, Twentieth Century Communist w/ Frank Marshall Davis
--
Posted By R. George Dunn to Northern Light at 12/25/2009 11:40:00 AM
MSNBC's Chris Matthews Cites "One Of Our Heroes From The Past" Saul Alinsky
Would the people wake up on time to save the country from the enemy within?
Can America be saved?
Posted: December 25, 2009
1:00 am Eastern
© 2009
In a 2008 radio interview, Barack Obama said:
" … the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn't that radical. It didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as its been interpreted and the Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties."
I tell you, life isn't fair. Why hasn't the Supreme Court ever ventured into the matter of "redistributive wealth?" And what in the world were the Founding Fathers thinking about when they failed to broach the subject?
Surely it was an oversight that they never addressed the issue of taking your assets and giving them to your neighbor. Or perhaps it's just an indication that George Washington, Benjamin Franklin and James Madison were cold, calloused individuals who enjoyed watching people suffer.
In the same interview, Chairman Obama went on to say that the Constitution "[says] what the federal government can't do to you, but doesn't say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf, and that hasn't shifted … and one of the … tragedies of the civil rights movement was … because the civil rights movement became so court focused, I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change."
Excuse me? Do on your behalf? Those stupid Founding Fathers again. They didn't even think to put in the Constitution what the government must do on your behalf. And what a tragedy it was that the civil rights movement didn't put together the coalition of powers that could bring about "redistributive change."
Forget the fact that the Constitution never mentions the redistribution of anything. After all, the debate is over: We all know that redistribution of wealth is the only moral way to operate a country, right?
America will go through a fundamental change in 2010 – guaranteed. Either it will be fundamentally transformed into a full-fledged socialist police state, then, ultimately, a communist police state, or those who still believe in freedom will do whatever it takes to overthrow the oligarchy that now rules over us.
If the Republicans, after winning back the House and Senate – or even coming close – continue to act like a branch of the Demopublican Party and ignore the Constitution, it most likely will bring into existence a third party (How about the Tea Party?) that would be the first such animal of the modern era that would have a legitimate shot at of winning the presidency in 2012.
(Column continues below)
| | |
But, as I have so often pointed out, the caveat is that the fascist president and Congress may very well find a Chavezian reason to declare a state of emergency and "postpone" the 2012 presidential election. Regardless of whether that emergency is a total collapse of the U.S. economy or a terrorist attack, don't be fooled. If it happens, it will be aplanned event by those who are now in power.
Via health care, cap and trade and other wildly unconstitutional measures, BHO and the criminal Congress will assure that the economy is many times worse off by next November's elections than it is now. The objective, of course, is to bring people to their knees so they will have "no other choice" but to look to benevolent government for help.
I believe that 20-25 percent unemployment is coming, more massive bailouts of companies "too big to fail," higher taxes, government controlled health care, cap and trade and, yes, jail time for those who do not obey the unconstitutional edicts of the criminal class in Washington.
Could I be wrong? Sure. I thought we'd have runaway inflation and a solidly entrenched police state by the mid '80s, but I underestimated the sheer power of Ronald Reagan's personality – not to mention the government's capacity to print fiat currency and borrow money.
Having said this, the only way that a "fundamentally transformed America" can be avoided is if:
1. Free elections are held in 2010
2. Conservative Republicans sweep into power
3. Said conservative Republicans immediately began to repeal all unconstitutional legislation – including government involvement in health care, welfare, regulation of the environment, government involvement in education … and so on.
In short, get rid of all government functions other than providing a legal system for arbitrating disputes, protecting the lives and property of citizens and providing for a national defense.
4. While all this is going on, those of us who are on the moral high road should be prepared to spend enormous amounts of time and energy educating the anesthetized, sports-crazy, entertainment-crazy, vacation-crazy masses about the wonders of the free market. We must put forth the effort to explain to them why liberty is the most valuable commodity they can ever possess. We must help them understand that liberty, not government handouts, gives them the best opportunity to achieve economic freedom.
The year 2010 will be like no other in American history. It is not just another Carter era of sheer stupidity and incompetence. This is the real thing. This is what progressives have been working toward since the days of Theodore Roosevelt. We are living through a major historical time that may very well shape the destiny of the human race for centuries to come – or bring about its final demise.
But cheer up – it's Christmas. Enjoy your family and the other things in your life that are dear to you. Then, refreshed, come back after the holiday prepared to do battle with the most corrupt government in U.S. history.
Robert Ringer is the author of three No. 1 best-sellers, including two books listed by the New York Times among the 15 best-selling motivational books of all time. He also hosts the highly acclaimed Liberty Education Interview Series, where he interviews today's top economic and political leaders on the most vital and controversial issues of our time. To tap into his profound wisdom and life-changing insights on a regular basis, sign up for a FREE subscription to his one-of-a-kind e-letter, "A Voice of Sanity in an Insane World," by visiting www.robertringer.com.
The year 2010 will be like no other in American history. It is not just another Carter era of sheer stupidity and incompetence. This is the real thing. This is what progressives have been working toward since the days of Theodore Roosevelt.
December 24, 2009
FairTax Needed~ Detroit in Ruins and what to expect for USA if Obama implements all the things he wants
----- Original Message -----From: Pedro A DelgadoSent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 1:09 PMSubject: [mikehuckabee-190] FW: Detroit in Ruins and what to expect for USA if Obama implements all the things he wants
Subject: Detroit in Ruins
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 11:41:29 -0500
Unions, liberal leaders, and the demise of the US auto industry have all taken their toll on the Motor City...unemployment in Detroit is now at 28%.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hhJ_49leBw
--
December 23, 2009
AG's of each State,Stand UP!!!; Constitution & Rule to Court; [then] Nullification
Nullification~Last Bastion to standing up to protect Constitutional American rights
given opportunity:
This unprecedented government takeover of American freedom must be
stopped. The tyrannical rule of Pelosi and Ried cannot be allowed to
continue. The laws they want so desperately to impose on us are
absolutely and without question unconstitutional. Please do all you can
to join with the 8 states and any others who are standing up to protect
Constitutional American rights and freedom.
"Mandating that individuals must obtain health insurance, and imposing
any penalty – civil or criminal – on any private citizen for not
purchasing health insurance is not authorized by any provision of the
U.S. Constitution."
Democrats have claimed that the individual mandate is authorized under
the Commerce Clause, the General Welfare Clause or the Taxing and
Spending Clause, according to CAP.
CAP argues that the federal government has limited jurisdiction,
"unless a specific provision of the Constitution empowers a particular
law, then that law is unconstitutional."
"Government can only regulate economic action; it cannot coerce action
on the part of private citizens who do not wish to participate in
commerce," — The Conservative Action Project (CAP)
Please consider and support Nullification.
In response to what some opponents see as a Congress that doesn't
represent their interests, State Legislators are looking to the nearly
forgotten American political tradition of nullification as a way to
reject any potential national health care program that may be coming
from Washington.
In 2010, residents of Arizona will be voting on a State Constitutional
Amendment that would let them effectively opt out of any proposed
national health care plan. Legislatures in Florida, Michigan, Ohio and
Pennsylvania are also considering similar State Constitutional
Amendments.
And now, Missouri is joining them. According to a report in The
Missourian, "Rep. Cynthia Davis, R-O'Fallon, pre-filed a bill Dec. 1
that, if approved by voters, would effectively put a halt on any
national health care legislation. Davis said her intent was to give
voters a way to protect themselves."
The principle behind such legislation is nullification, which has a
long history in the American tradition. When a state "nullifies" a
federal law, it is proclaiming that the law in question is void and
inoperative, or "non-effective," within the boundaries of that state;
or, in other words, not a law as far as the state is concerned.
Early nullification movements began with the Virginia and Kentucky
Resolutions of 1798. These resolutions, secretly authored by Thomas
Jefferson and James Madison, asserted that the people of the states, as
sovereign entities, could judge for themselves whether the federal
government had overstepped its constitutional bounds -- to the point of
ignoring federal laws.
Virginia and Kentucky passed the resolutions in response to the federal
Alien and Sedition Acts, which provided, in part, for the prosecution
of anyone who criticized Congress or the President of the United
States.
Nullification was regularly called upon by states all over the country
in response to everything from higher taxes to the fugitive slave law
of 1850.
Nullification. Very much an option for all the states to follow and
some already are. Namely, Missouri.....already has a bill tracking
..... and Texas and Oklahoma. Read the links.
www.campaignforliberty.com/article.php?view=429
www.americanvote.info
http://tinyurl.com/y9ek4qws
November 17, 2009
A quote from 1944 on Socialism and the Democrats
"A heavy or progressive or graduated income tax is necessary for the proper development of Communism." - Karl Marx /Amessage from 1944 Socialist Party President at this link | ||||||||||||
Windows 7: I wanted simpler, now it's simpler. I'm a rock star.
July 23, 2009
Health Care Fairy Tale
There isn't any question that there is a disconnect between the President and the American people on the issue of health care. Most Americans do not want government controlled health care. They do want lower costs.
Like most Americans, I find myself asking again and again, why the rush to adopt a national health care plan that will consume 1/6 of our federal budget? Isn't this an important issue that we should take our time on, debate fully all of the proposals being floated, and make sure that everyone, including our legislators, has a chance to read the bill?
The Obama Administration continues to say that the issue has been debated for years. That may or may not be true, but what is true is that the bills being proposed on Capitol Hill have not been debated!!! In fact, no one seems to know what is in them
The President cites as a reason for quick action, rising costs of health care. Yet even the Congressional Budget Office says the plans being offered will not decrease costs, and in fact, will increase them. Seems like a good time to get our figures straight before we try to pass any legislation...
