Please, everyone must view or listen to this 19 minutes of truth baring~ 'Rebranding of Karl Marx'

Please, everyone must view or listen to this 19 minutes of truth baring~

Constitutional conduct is catching fire as a plank! @RepRonPaul surges in #SC

Constitutional conduct is catching fire as a plank. Soon, maybe States will wake up to their sovereignty to the fact that the Federal Government does not own any property in their State that they have not given permission to, including oil exploration~

http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-national/ron-paul-surges-south-carolina

Ron Paul surges in South Carolina

www.examiner.com

One week from tomorrow voters will go to the polls in South Carolina to express their preference as to who will face Barack Obama in the 2012 Presidential campa

My Activist path of the 2008 to the 2012 Primary eve in Iowa

When Newt dropped out in 2007, I found myself having to get active and vett candidates. When I ran into Governor Huckabee, it was like he had a recorder in my home repeating everything I had said.

Governor Huckaee would have been President had he not been bulldogged in SC debate. He has the Quest as his own. Then cam Cain, who too has the Quest in his Mission.

All during the past five years, I have spent a lot of time countering the lies about Ron Paul and the mediabot hate for him We must recognize the we are being divided on the right, leaving the Constitutionalists formed regardless of their State affiliation.

Paul has come to the top in a big way this year, being the only Constitutionalist standing in the top tier. Despite the thousands of cuts causing ferocity hazing, his Quest is the Constitution and fiscal repair. A week ago, I came to a pint that I said, done, no more vetting. Constitutionalist Paul has my support.

The Social Conservatives have defined Constitutional conduct as their number one plank. The anti-war crowd on the left are many. Momentum for the Constitutionalist will draw from the right and if it is Paul, he will sink Obama.

Should Paul fail to beat back the Nationalists and those who are not awake yet to it, then you can count on a third party. Sent Sarah a note to ready ready and to seek the Constitutionalist party ticket. Doctor Paul endorsed the Constitutionalist candidate in 2008. This may be the most interesting year of the century and we just got started. If we do well, we could see our future setting new standards in American Prosperity. If we go the wrong way, it will take most of the century to get anywhere and if liberty is involved.

FairTax will provide a GDP of way north of 10% per year for years to come and Constitutional conduct will create such a peace and tranquility, blessings will overflow.

When our Constitution was devised,it was a given that local governance was the norm, from the bottom up. If the local level could not do it, the next level up would. It was not question of convenience, but a matter of principle. Now we rule by decree rather then common law.

'Why the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact should die' WSJ

Founders established electoral with more then two Political Parties in mind & to curb largess States(Cities) from dominating Presidential Elections, 1/3 of Federal Government. There is a push amongst the States by those who think Nationalizing the Federal Government is a good idea and are supporting a measure to make the Presidential Election by popular vote, not the current Electoral Constitutional Law.

The following link speaks to the Massachusetts attempt to make that State one of a future coalition of such States, bypassing the Constitution. We did the same thing with the U.S. Senate and gave it the popular vote.  Now, instead of the Senator being loyal to the Sovereignty of his State Legislatures desire,Senators are now loyal to the Lobbyists with the people molded vote being that of the Media's.

I say: Repeal the 17th Amendment and put the loyalty of the U. S. Senate back to the State Governments and Leave our current Electoral College Laws as are. Look at the history of our Constitution and then think, liberty. We are better served by each County holding a Caucus before we go to the national Bake sale.

Faithless Lawmakers

'Why the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact should die - Wall Street Journal http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703578104575397100729241576.html

Independence Caucus vetting fiscally responsible candidates in Colorado

Independence Caucus vetting fiscally responsible candidates in Colorado

December 19, 9:53 PM

Denver Conservative Examiner

Kathleen Baker

A group of ordinary citizens from Utah shocked the political world last year by defeating a six-term incumbent and replacing him with a fiscally conservative candidate who was outspent six to one by his challenger. Now they are taking their model nationally with chapters in 45 states, including Colorado. Fed up with politics as usual, these citizens founded the Independence Caucus to replace politicians financed by special interests with fiscally responsible candidates who support Constitutional principles.

During the 2008 Utah Republican primary election, the Independence Caucus targeted U.S. Representative Chris Cannon, a six-term incumbent who had endorsements from President Bush, both Utah senators, three newspapers, and the vast majority of the state GOP establishment. Their goal was to replace Cannon with Jason Chaffetz, a candidate with no significant endorsements and little money. With the grassroots help of 1,000 volunteers, Chaffetz was able to beat out Cannon during the Republican primary by a vote of 60% to 40%. He continued on to win the general election with 66% of the vote.

Riding this success, the organization has gone nationally and has sent requests to more than 1300 candidates to go through their vetting process. This process starts with a candidate filling out an 80-question form followed by an hour-long teleconference where members of the Independence Caucus are allowed to freely ask the candidates questions. The group established the questions based on the fundamental reforms the membership sees as critical in endorsing a candidate. These reforms include fixing the nation's budget problems and taxation policies and restoring the country back to Constitutional law and the Tenth Amendment.

The questionnaire is designed as a simple yes/no format so that candidates must openly state their knowledge of Constitutional law and fiscal responsibility, and whether or not they will pledge to these issues if elected...full article

FairTax Needed~ Detroit in Ruins and what to expect for USA if Obama implements all the things he wants

Steven Crowder was on Fox yesterday and made an update on the 28%, saying it is now 50%. One out two people are jobless.  It is also reported that the School Board tried to close unnecessary Schools and was met by angry crowds wanting to keep open.  I imagine it has to do with jobs and threat of mixing these distressed communities children at such a time.

 

We need FairTax yesterday and get us back to work.  Tell everyone to tell everyone.

 

R. George Dunn

----- Original Message -----

From: Pedro A Delgado

To: mikehuckabee-190@meetup.com

Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2009 1:09 PM

Subject: [mikehuckabee-190] FW: Detroit in Ruins and what to expect for USA if Obama implements all the things he wants

---

Subject: Detroit in Ruins
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 11:41:29 -0500

Unions, liberal leaders, and the demise of the US auto industry have all taken their toll on the Motor City...unemployment in Detroit is now at 28%.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hhJ_49leBw

---

--

Why George opposes Chairman Steele* Levis Add: a call for Revolution*RNC Chair Steele tells Teaparty no to agenda

----- Original Message -----

From: George

To: mikehuckabee-7@meetup.com

Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 6:41 PM

Subject: Re: [mikehuckabee-7] Levis Add: a call for Revolution*RNC Chair Steele tells Teaparty no to agenda

When President Bush offered ACORN 20 Billion dollars to get the Democrats to support his bailout, knowing the GOP would be split, that is when I had a clear view of everything that has transpired for years, how we have went down the road of Nationalism.  Mr. Steele is a Nationalist.  We have Conservative nationalists and Conservative Federalists in the GOP , both using the mantra they are for smaller Federal Government.  The difference is, the Steeles' want a small Nationalist Government and hide that fact that it is not a Constitutional Government.  They are saying it is too late to roll back the programs we have.

That is why I think less of Michael Steele.  It has nothing to do with anything else but that.  Newt Gingrich is another and as for Romney, he is for Romney, big corporations, big international business in charge.  Truth to the NWO is there is a lot of the Presidents over the years slowly unfolding the USA into the envelope of NEO.  Why else do we still have a tax structure that is destroying us?  It is not that they are stupid.  Romney became rich with Baines Capital by allowing the tax structure to remain the same.

Now the USA is on the verge of second nation status.  By eliminating our manufacturing base, we have eliminated the foundation of employment.  Farming used to be, but the Model T-Ford changed that, switching agriculture to less consumption and less employment.  Now we have an Obama Administration, created by the 9/12/2009 Bailout, a timing in which Sarah Palin was sending John McCain over the top.  And the way he was acting, it was as if he had agreed long ago to make Obama President.  Anyway, President Bush stopped the ground swell by implementing the crisis.  The Crisis was a result of the International Banks invoking BASEL IV, a plan that demanded all members of the International Banking exchange to have their National Bank Books opened to transparency on 08-01/2009.  The USA is the only Bank of the World of Nations to fail to open their books.  The USA was given a one month extension to 10/01/2009.  To this day, congress is afraid of the Washington power, the Shadow and has not yet opened the books to Congress itself, let alone the international banks.

The Shadow played the Democrats and Republicans as a good party bad party scenario, but in the end the Nationalist left always won, with the GOP joining them on the golf courses. 

We have been hoodwinked and it continues even today.  If you close enough you will see their subtle way s of brain washing America through a complacent media, including Fox.  The difference now is, that instead of just the Congress dancing, so is the media playing off each other, throwing in little steps of instrumentalism that are accepted words being they derive from the side of support to our Populist cause.  Ever wonder why both parties put down Populists?  WE out number both partners 2 to 1.

----- Original Message -----

From: Camille Johnson

To: mikehuckabee-7@meetup.com

Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 6:09 PM

Subject: Re: [mikehuckabee-7] Levis Add: a call for Revolution*RNC Chair Steele tells Teaparty no to agenda

George, Why are you so hard on the GOP or Michael Steele?  We know they are the better of the 2 parties and they are conservative, which I assume everyone on this Huckabee 7 group is Republican and conservative.  Merry Christmas all.  Camille

----- Original Message -----

From: George

To: mikehuckabee-7@meetup.com

Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 10:14 PM

Subject: [mikehuckabee-7] Levis Add: a call for Revolution*RNC Chair Steele tells Teaparty no to agenda

What an evening.  First off sitting with the Granddaughter, on comes this Levis commercial calling the youth to Arms.

Levi's: OPioneers! - Go Forth campaign -A battle cry for youth of West to take up by Walt Whitman http://bit.ly/7O4zlQ |Bye RINOs

Then along comes evidence of Michael Steele telling Virginia Tea Partiers, that their agenda is not allowed:

Steele tells VA teaparty 2not demand an agenda,but go 4 seat|Good advise after Primary http://bit.ly/2ju06

@ryanobles: Michael Steele to GOP cand. in #VA5th-"If you have another agenda, I'm asking you not to play"- http://decisionvirginia.com/

Dear RNC: No more top down in primaries, period! @MichaelSteele should be fired for his war of words to VA teaparty Constitutional agenda

Only reason 4 @MichaelSteele 2 disk Teaparty is 2 advance his/RINOs Nationalist agenda: either RINOs rule or would prefer dems; or stupid

Libertarian to teaparty to Patriot to Federalist to Pioneers.We don't take no for an answer. need 10 yr plan to Constitutional spending

@RGeorgeDunn, Ten years is too long.

RT @beam_ad: RGD,Ten years is too long.|History teaches that empires don't change overnight, but take a decade or 2 for smooth transition

Patriot Federalist Pioneer,

R. George Dunn

Constitution or bust GOP!

The GOP kisses the Rust Belt goodbye~Susan J. Demas |no Susan not GOP, RINOs

The GOP kisses the Rust Belt goodbye

by Susan J. Demas

Do the Republicans ever plan to win Michigan again? How about Ohio, Illinois or even Indiana?

Before the gang of GOP senators killed the $14 billion bridge loan for Chrysler and General Motors last week, they unleashed an ugly Southern snobbery about us Rust Belt rubes. And they just might have strangled their chances in here for years to come.

Let's not forget the GOP just lost the entire region to the man who will become the first African-American president, save for West Virginia. The Republicans only have one governorship here, in Indiana. Evidently, U.S. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell & Co. want to finish the job. full article

***

My comment:

 

Susan, you have sighted in the Big Gov Big Business RINOs(Republicans in Name Only)who have been herding the GOP for many years.  They are better identified as Nationalists. Though we may differ on the constitutional power the Federal Government to bail out industry, you have given a clear view of not only the GOP but of the Democrats also.  Neither have been for the interest of we the people.

 

How is it that this Grand Nation has been brought to it's knees.  How is it the strongest industrial manufacturing center of the world is now, as you say, 'a rust belt memory'?  Your right, Saul does get it and he nearly became the RNC Chairman, but the good ole boy Shadow, insisted on a strong RINO, Mr. Steele.

 

Now to the underlying fact that has had us all hoodwinked for many years.  Since the introduction of Free Trade policy by President Reagan, we have watched and listened to both parties tell us that it is a good thing for us to lose jobs overseas, because we are so smart that we will replace them with strong service jobs and new technology.  With the federal reserve keeping check our labor force to maintain an overabound number of workers, the family cashflow has dwindled to where it takes 3 wage earners to just get by.

 

When free trade kicked in, what was overlooked, in my opinion, purposefully, is the tax structure we had created under a 50 State free trade policy, inwhich the ever expanding federal government got it's revenue.  These taxes were built into the price of domestic product due to the simplistic and tyrannical method of using business structure to control collecting tax.  This has resulted in the handicapping of domestic manufacturing putting a 22%(now more) product cost on top of actual production costs, making foreign products a cheaper buy for consumers.  We have not been on an equal trading floor since the 1980s.

 

An example of those who took advantage of raping America of Her jobs is Baines Capital.  Romney gained huge wealth by cannibalizing American business and taking the contract order overseas to evade the USA Tax structure, including at State taxation level in Michigan and other States under the same production tax system.

 

The democrats are not blameless in this either.  They embrace the production tax as a method of controlling the workers and distributing the wealth through the progressive income tax system.

 

Hope you were able to keep with me on this.  It is a boring subject, but most important.  The cure to our present plight of joblessness, especially in the Rust Belt is to change the Tax structure from production to consumption, lowering the manufacturing cost of domestic product by removing all taxes hidden and putting it onto a consumption tax, which will tax imports equally to domestic goods.  Jobs will flood back to America.

 

Twenty some years ago, a group of scholars from the highest pedigree of schools gathered and spent 20 million dollars perfecting a new tax structure to consumption.  This plan sits in both chambers of Congress ready to go on January first of the year it is implemented.  It has around 80 co-sponsors in the House and has grown in popularity across the nation.  As people study and learn of the value of this plan, they make it a Cause for saving America.  It is not a party cause, it is an American cause.  As of late, a President Obama State Coordinator has joined the chorus of supporters.

 

The plan is the FairTax plan, the same one that Governor Huckabee has as his platform for the Quest of fixing America.  As the Governor has said, it is not Wall street we need to fix, it is Main Street.  Please consider joining in this cause.  A note of support for Saul Anuzis, he is a former member of the National Board  of Directors for the FairTax Organization.  I agree fully in your assessment of Saul as a superb leader.  Your support in the www.FairTax.org Plan may just be the single event to push the plan up over the top and bring salvation to America.

 

In Michigan we are attempting to make our State busniess friendly too by pusing for enactment of the www.MIFairTax.org plan. Would you help?

Constitutional Scholar read Health Care Bill 3200="the most massive transfer of power to the Executive Branch of government "

Wed Dec 2, 2009 5:02 pm (PST)

 

Someone did read the entire House Bill 3200: The Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009

 

From Michael Connelly - Retired attorney,

Constitutional Law Instructor,

Carrollton, Texas

 

Well, I have done it! I have read the entire text of proposed House Bill 3200: The Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009. I studied it with particular emphasis from my area of expertise, constitutional law... I was frankly concerned that parts of the proposed law that were being discussed might be unconstitutional.

 

 What I found was far worse than what I had heard or expected.  To begin with, much of what has been said about the law and its implications is in fact true, despite what the Democrats and the media are saying.  The law does provide for rationing of health care, particularly where senior citizens and other classes of citizens are involved, free health care for illegal immigrants, free abortion services, and probably forced participation in abortions by members of the medical profession.

 

The Bill will also eventually force private insurance companies out of business and put everyone into a government run system. All decisions about personal health care will ultimately be made by federal bureaucrats and most of them will not be health care professionals. Hospital admissions, payments to physicians, and allocations of necessary medical devices will be strictly controlled.

 

However, as scary as all of that it, it just scratches the surface. In fact, I have concluded that this legislation really has no intention of providing affordable health care choices. Instead it is a convenient cover for the most massive transfer of power to the Executive Branch of government that has ever occurred, or even been contemplated. If this law or a similar one is adopted, major portions of the Constitution of the United States will effectively have been destroyed.

 

The first thing to go will be the masterfully crafted balance of power between the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the U.S. Government... The Congress will be transferring to the Obama Administration authority in a number of different areas over the lives of the American people and the businesses they own. The irony is that the Congress doesn't have any authority to legislate in most of those areas to begin with. I defy anyone to read the text of the U.S. Constitution and find any authority granted to the members of Congress to regulate health care.

 

This legislation also provides for access by the appointees of the Obama administration of all of your personal healthcare information, your personal financial information, and the information of your employer, physician, and hospital. All of this is a direct violation of the specific provisions of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution protecting against unreasonable searches and seizures. You can also forget about the right to privacy. That will have been legislated into oblivion regardless of what the 3rd and 4th Amendments may provide.

 

If you decide not to have healthcare insurance or if you have private insurance that is not deemed "acceptable" to the "Health Choices Administrator" appointed by Obama there will be a tax imposed on you. It is called a "tax" instead of a fine because of the intent to avoid application of the due process clause of the 5th Amendment.  However, that doesn't work because since there is nothing in the law that allows you to contest or appeal the imposition of the tax, it is definitely depriving someone of property without the "due process of law.

 

So, there are three of those pesky amendments that the far left hate so much out the original ten in the Bill of Rights that are effectively nullified by this law. It doesn't stop there though. The 9th Amendment  that provides: "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people;" The 10th Amendment states: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved to  the States respectively, or to the people." Under the provisions of this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once were theirs to control.

 

I could write many more pages about this legislation, but I think you get the idea. This is not about health care; it is about seizing power and limiting rights. Article 6 of the Constitution requires the members of both houses of Congress to "be bound by oath or affirmation" to support the Constitution. If I was a member of Congress I would not be able to vote for this legislation or anything like it without feeling I was violating that sacred oath or affirmation. If I voted for it anyway I would hope the American people would hold me accountable.

 

For those who might doubt the nature of this threat I suggest they consult the source. Here is a link to the Constitution:

 

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html

 

And another to the Bill of Rights:

 

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html

 

There you can see exactly what we are about to have taken from us.

 

Michael Connelly

Retired attorney,

Constitutional Law Instructor

Carrollton, Texas

 

***

below is authenticity of the above 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Guy Holland

To: ronpaul-39@meetup.com

Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 3:09 AM

Subject: [ronpaul-39] Someone read the Health bill for Constitutionality

 

Dear Guy:

 

  Thank you for your inquiry. Yes, I did write this article. You can find the original on my website and blog as well as more recent articles I have written on the same subject matter. The link is below. You can also go to the "About" page of the website to view my credentials.

 

Best regards,

Michael

 

 

Michael Connelly Personal website and Blog http://michaelconnelly.viviti.com/  

 

Author of "The Mortarmen" a book about my father's unit in WWII;

"Riders in the Sky: The Ghosts and Legends of Philmont Scout Ranch" ;

and my just released novel "Amayehli: A Story of America".

  

I also teach law courses via the Internet through colleges and universities worldwide. To find a college or university near you, go to Education To Go's website at www.ed2go.com.

 

 

 

From: guyrex@comcast.net  

To: mrobertc@hotmail.com  

Subject: Re: Someone read the Health bill for Constitutionality  

Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 08:54:11 -0500

 

 Mr. Connelly,

 

 Before I circulate this, would you please confirm this as your handiwork?

 

 Thank you in advance for your assistance.

 

 Best regards,

 

 Guy

 

Guy R. Holland, CFP  

Tax & Financial Planning, since 1975  

10343 Tophill Drive  

Hartland, MI 48353 USA

 

 Telephone: 248-470-4916

 

 Vote Congress Out in 2010...  http://ThrowThemOut.com

 

 Join the R3VOLution  http://CampaignForLiberty.com

 

 

Conservative/Liberal Nationalists verses Federalists for Control of D.C.

FairTax has become a huge faction and their support can be the difference.  To say I would support the first candidate who supports fairtax, would most likely be someone of the character we need.  It is not being a single issue plank, it is being a single issue caucus getting big enough to demand respect, support.  It's a horse race even for the Federalists.

 

I asked this of the old media today after Fox News panel showed bias by twisting truth on Huckabee, caught read handed by Pinkerton and prompted these two tweets:

 

MILLER,FNC: found it interesting (Nationalist-)conservative media harder on Huckabee than liberal media http://bit.ly/57OvD5 #palin tcot ff

*

Being FoxNews is Conservative Nationalist, any lib. nationalist media want to become the Federalist & lead this Nation to Glory~ cnn abc cbs

*

 

Of late, been defining our different coalitions as this:

 

RINO Republicans= Conservative Nationalists

 

far left liberals= Socialist Nationalists

 

Moderates= Moderate Nationalists or lost Federalists

 

Conservative right= Federalists

 

Federalist is one who supports the Constitution as written, holding State Sovereignty as key to maintaining the Federal Government from growing tyrannically.

 

We need to unite under a brand and being our Founders were Federalists, so be our Re-Founding.  Those who are of the Federalist character are many.  As Glenn Beck says, "We surround them".  Does that make us a party?  Nope, it makes us a faction to which we are plenty large enough to cater to.  I am also passionate to the name Constitutionalist.

 

In labeling those we test at the Independence Caucus, would you say that by reaching 70%, you can safely say they are Federalist?  By not choosing the best Federalist, we become a faction.  If only one Federalist in the primary, it is a given.  Don't trap yourself, trap the GOP.  If that fails take it to the Constitution Party.  If we get nationalists from either party, what loss is there to going third Party.  Lincoln did it.  Isn't that so D.C.?

 

 

DetNews.com

Michael Barone

Big government can't put young adults to work

"What have you done for me lately?" It's a question that voters implicitly ask politicians, especially ones they have supported and who are seeking their votes again. And it's a question that young voters in particular may be asking Barack Obama, whom they supported by a 66 percent to 32 percent margin 13 months ago.

It's a question that is obviously on the minds of some thoughtful Democrats. They've noticed that unemployment among the young is well above the national average -- it reached 27.6 percent among those ages 16 to 19 in October.

They've noticed that an increasing number of young people -- about half of those between ages 18 and 24 -- are still living in their parents' homes. They've noticed that entry-level work is scarce, as older workers cling to their jobs.

So they're urging the Obama administration and the Democratic Congress to do something to help young people. But they seem to be having a hard time coming up with solutions that match the scope of the problem....

***

my comment:

 

Very good article.  It is a great piece to introduce what will work and it is not government, but is government getting out of the way.  Go to http://Mifairtax.org and to http://fairtax.org to find the truth about how our State and Nation has been scourged of jobs by our production tax structures in Michigan and the USA.  How can we compete with anyone with our taxes, and high taxation to boot, is built into the price of our Michigan Product when imports evade taxation?  How is it that manufacturing flooded out of Michigan and the USA right after free trade was implemented in the 1980's?  Why is it that companies like Baines Capital took advantage of this by buying up struggling companies in a recession and took the contracts overseas to fill the orders and bypass our American taxes? 

 

Nope, the DPW will not work.  Who would get on the end of a shovel when a backhoe is about digging ditches?  Who would spend our taxes on such foolishness?  It is about as smart as flooding the top of the banking system with funds instead of flooding the small bank accounts with funds into individual mortgages and/IRAs which would end up at the top of the banking system? 

 

It appears, with our demise from not correcting the tax structure with free trade and this crisis bailout, crime of the century, to hide the Federal Reserve books from BASEL of the international banking community, that we the American people are the biggest dummies on the planet.  We are being punished for being the greatest enterprise this planet has ever known and for what, greed.  Shall we roll up in a ball and say la vie or shall we rise up and do something about it.  Demand Constitutional conduct by the Feds and demand FairTax at the Federal level and in Michigan.  Let's educate the Nation by leading it to the promised land by passing the MIFairTax plan.

 

George Dunn

Did the GOP Really lose it's way?~Rich Muny

Very good analysis of what happened over the past 10 years. Here is a link to Independence Caucus, a site for vetting candidates on their constitutional character. http://icaucus.ning.com

What is the difference between a Conservative Nationalist and a liberal nationalist? A Federalist. When President Bush offered the Democrats 20 billion dollars for ACORN to get them to sign the first bailout, that did it, it turned on the light and these elitists in DC are exposed. Do not vote for any candidate who is not a fundamentalist of the Constitution, even if it means voting third party. But let us not be ignorant to the benefit of cleaning up the GOP of it's RINOs.

Great article.

 

George

***

Did the GOP Really Lose Its Way?

by Rich Muny

Many conservative politicians, radio hosts, and pundits have repeatedly stated their shared belief that the Republican Party "lost its way" prior to the 2008 election.  In their minds, the entire conservative movement believed in limited government and low spending and was simply corrupted by absolute power.  They may be surprised to learn that this is not the case at all.  The fact that party leadership turned its back on limited government and low spending was entirely predictable.  In fact, it should have been expected....continue article here

"To Form A More Perfect Union" Narrative by Chief Justice John G. Roberts

"To Form A More Perfect Union" Narrative by John G. Roberts

By Michael Zielinski on November 27th, 2009
Categories: US Coins, US Mint

On December 3, 2009, the United States Mint will release the 2009 Proof American Platinum Eagle. The reverse design of the one ounce .9995 platinum coin will feature the first of six different designs to commemorate the core concepts of American Democracy.

The collectible version of the Platinum Eagle has carried a different reverse design for each year of issue. This has included two previous multi-year design programs. The "Vistas of Liberty" program, which ran from 1998 to 2002, featured depictions of the Bald Eagle in different regions of the United States. The "Foundations of Democracy" program, which ran from 2006 to 2008, featured designs representing the three branches of government.

The current program will run from 2009 to 2014 and represent the core concepts of American democracy through representations of the six principles of the Preamble of the United States Constitution. This will include:  To Form a More Perfect Union (2009), To Establish Justice (2010), To Insure Domestic Tranquility (2011), To Provide for the Common Defense (2012), To Promote General Welfare (2013), and To Secure the Blessings of Liberty to Ourselves and our Posterity (2014). Themes for each of the reverse designs are inspired by narratives prepared by Chief Justice of the United States, John G. Roberts, Jr., at the request of the US Mint.

The Chief Justice's first narrative is presented below. This narrative inspired the reverse design of the 2009 Proof Platinum Eagle, which features four faces representing the diversity of the Nation, with hair and clothing intertwined to symbolize the principle "To Form a More Perfect Union."

"To Form A More Perfect Union" by John G. Roberts, Jr.

When the thirteen American colonies issued their Declaration of Independence from Great Britain in 1776, they recognized that the success of the American Revolution depended on unity in opposition to British rule. As the Revolutionary War progressed, those thirteen fledgling entities agreed, through "Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union," to establish the United States of America. The Articles of Confederation proved inadequate, however, in creating an effective national government. After the Revolutionary War, the states convened a constitutional convention in Philadelphia to reconsider the terms of their confederation. During that fateful summer of 1787, America's leading statesmen drafted the Constitution of the United States of America with the avowed objective "to form a more perfect Union."

John Jay, who would later become the first Chief Justice of the United States, joined James Madison and Alexander Hamilton in authoring a series of essays, now known as The Federalist Papers, to urge the citizens to support ratification of the Constitution. In The Federalist No.2, Jay explained that the Constitution's promise of "a more perfect Union" rested upon a unity of distinctly American ideals, interests, and experiences that joined the people of the United States together as one nation.

Jay noted that "independent America was not composed of detached and distant territories," but rather was "one connected, fertile, widespreading country" with "a variety of soils," "innumerable streams," and a "succession of navigable waters" that "forms a kind of chain round its borders as if to bind it together." Jay also recognized that "Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people" who, "by their joint counsels, arms, and efforts, fighting side by side throughout a long and bloody war, have nobly established their general liberty and independence." He discerned a connection between the land and the people:

This country and this people seem to have been made for each other, and it appears as if it was the design of Providence that an inheritance so proper and convenient for a band of brethren, united to each other by the strongest ties, should never be split into a number of unsocial, jealous, and alien sovereignties.

John Jay believed that this "band of brethren" found unity in the English ancestry, heritage, and customs that many of the citizens of his era shared. But history has shown that the Constitution's aspiration of "a more perfect Union" rests more fundamentally on a unity of common beliefs that Americans of all backgrounds throughout history have embraced. As the United States has expanded across the continent, overcome internal conflict, and welcomed new states, the nation has found enduring strength in its people's diverse origins and perspectives. The United States remains perpetually united by a shared dedication to the ideals of liberty, justice, and equality. Through those shared ideals, each new generation has sustained the Constitution's promise of "a more perfect Union."

 

My Comment:

 

Chief Justice Roberts has said it well.  Let us not become alien Sovereignties.

• Let us become united Sovereignties, standing in unison within the Constitution of the USA. 
• Let us remind the Federal Government their roll and to stop unconstitutional conduct. 
• Let us repeal the Amendment 17 - Senators Elected by Popular Vote and return the Senate to being appointed by State Assemblies, thereby ending the unconstitutional reign of the Shadow in Washington DC by Old Media Bias.
• Let us repeal the sixteenth Amendment and return sanity to our Tax Structure Federally via the FairTax.org
• Let us suggest each State enact their own Health Care solution by mandating the HSA/IRA plan through private insurance.

Thank you Chief Justice Roberts for this Oration.

 

R. George Dunn

Bucking GOP hierarchy, Senator DeMint supports..| Federalist conservatives

Bucking GOP hierarchy, DeMint supports conservative underdogs

S.C. senator's willingness to defy the party establishment rare for freshman lawmaker.

By James Rosen
McClatchy Newspapers

Posted: Sunday, Nov. 29, 2009

Sen. Jim DeMint: "We've got a chance in this next election to prove a lot of establishment Republicans wrong and show that anywhere in the country principled conservatives can win."

WASHINGTON South Carolina's Sen. Jim DeMint is using his rising national profile among conservative activists to support and bankroll Republican Senate candidates around the country, some of them underdogs challenging GOP establishment favorites.
DeMint's endorsements of former Florida House Speaker Marco Rubio over Gov. Charlie Crist and California state Rep. Chuck DeVore over former Hewlett-Packard chief executive Carly Fiorina put him at odds with other prominent Republicans, including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, Sen. John McCain of Arizona and fellow South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham.
In Pennsylvania, DeMint's endorsement of former Rep. Pat Toomey helped prompt incumbent Sen. Arlen Specter to bolt the Republican Party and run for re-election as a Democrat.
DeMint, who has met with or plans to interview 20 GOP candidates in eight states, has started doling out money from his Senate Conservatives Fund, a political action committee that's raised $1.45 million - most of it from supporters in other states.
"We've got a chance in this next election to prove a lot of establishment Republicans wrong and show that anywhere in the country principled conservatives can win," DeMint told thousands of activists in a Nov. 3 conference call.
DeMint, a first-term senator seeking re-election next year, has attracted conservative followers nationwide for blocking appropriations earmarks, helping to defeat immigration reforms and leading GOP opposition to expanded federal medical benefits.
DeMint's willingness to go outside his party's official endorsement structure - led by Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, head of the National Republican Senatorial Committee - is rare for a sitting senator, and virtually unheard of for a freshman.
Katon Dawson, a former S.C. Republican chairman who narrowly lost to Michael Steele in January to head the national party, said DeMint's name increasingly resonates in other states.
"He now is in a prominent leadership role in the Republican Party to where his endorsement matters and means something," Dawson said.
Among 413 donors who've contributed at least $200 to DeMint's Senate Conservatives Fund political action committee, only eight are from South Carolina.
DeMint, 58, makes no bones that he's more focused on advancing conservative goals nationwide than on pursuing the parochial interests of his state.
"All of you all over the country - please remember that Senate seats are not about a particular state," DeMint told more than 4,000 listeners on the recent conference call.
"They're about our country," DeMint said. "Every vote I take is not about South Carolina. It's about the United States of America."
DeMint, a resident of heavily Republican Upstate South Carolina, hosted a conference call with Eric Erickson, a founder of the popular conservative blog redstate.com.
After the NRSC endorsed Crist in his run for Congress, Erickson called for his readers not to make any contributions to candidates backed by the official Republican campaign committee.
DeMint was the only senator who addressed tens of thousands of Tea Party protesters Sept. 12 at an anti-Obama rally outside the U.S. Capitol. Some carried signs comparing Obama to Nazi founder Adolf Hitler and al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden.
Susan McManus, a political science professor at the University of South Florida, said Democrats are trying to link DeMint with Erickson in a bid similar to Republicans' efforts last year to tie Obama to the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, the president's former minister in Chicago who had bitterly criticized the United States in sermons.
Obama, though, distanced himself from Wright, while DeMint continues to use Erickson's army of followers to reach conservative activists....full article
***
my comment:
All the names mentioned in this article, McConnell, Graham, McCain, Cornyn, all have one thing in common, they are for conservative Nationalism and probably not a clue what it means to be a Federalist Conservative.  RINOs are on the hit list and it may be these guys if they don't repent and read the Constitution. Go Eric Erickson of http://www.redstate.com/ ~~~
R. George Dunn