Constitution's Article Five use for back to Constitutional Conduct

Constitution's Article Five use for back to Constitutional Conduct~

The only way to vote for someone who has any Nationalist plank in their platform is if the unconstitutional conduct is being used to work our way back to Constitutional Conduct.  If we have something we want to keep that is unconstitutional, we can put it up for a vote of the States' legislatures to keep or not to keep, through the use of Article Five of the Constitution.

Want to keep regulation of something, make it a Constitutional law or stop.  We have regulation of food and have better living through chemical engineering and a company like Monsanto becoming a beast.  It is a State power to control all property within the State, including the use of chemicals.  However, provisions to protect State Sovereignty, such as an opt out clause be put  in all kept regulation by Article Five, that it can be a State power to refuse, making it voluntary compliance.

Texas GOP Convention Chair admits States' cannot bind National Delegates ~ RNC Rule 38

RNC Rule 38~


Texas State Convention votes all Texas RNC Delegates 

are unbound to the national Convention,

extending their voice in agreement with 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oavnKfyHEJE&feature=colike

GOP Delegates are all uncommitted at National Convention 1st Vote

http://rgeorgedunn.blogspot.com/2012/05/gop-delegates-are-all-uncommitted-at.html   

--
If everyone knew all there is to know, they would not do half the things they do, including myself, therefore I must foregive them, including myself.~RGeorgeDunn

Newt Gingrich on 'Rediscovering God in America from our founding to today' at Cornerstone Church March 2012

Invited by Diana and John Hagee, Newt Gingrich speaks at Cornerstone Church in San Antonio, Texas about Rediscovering God in America from our founding to today. 


In Part 1, Newt addresses the importance of bravery for preserving our freedom and the danger of secularism.

Part 1

In part 2 Gingrich talks about the truths of the Declaration of Independence and what they mean for today and the false understanding of the establishment clause

Part 2

In Part 3 Gingrich discusses the false understanding of the establishment clause of the 1st amendment and Pope John Paul II's trip to Poland in 1979, and American Exceptionalism

Part 3

Does the Federal Government actually own Land and control morals?

Who Owns the West

Expand your view to read how much land the Federal Government is holding in violation of the Constitution. The Federal Government has no authority to control land or morals.

Here is the defining in the Constitution to the extent the Federal Government Constitutionally is limited to:

US Constitution, Article I, section eight  " ...To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings; ..."

*

The brainwashed mediabots we are today, People have been fed the information needed to think Doctor Paul is a fringe character. Anyone who has been paying attention to how the two parties have been dancing us down this road of Nationalism would understand that there is a Shadow power, the establishment. Look at what GOP were going to give out to the Dems for the first bailout, 20 billion to ACORN! 

Join the Awakening,,, get out of the box.

http://www.great-awakening.com/?page_id=22

*

There is a lot of anti-Shariah law out there. In the old days we went by that law, until we found Jesus new way. Ours is founded in common law lost to the Courts. Maybe if we had back our common law, we would not have government telling us how to live.

...This page comments on the constitutional arguments of the revolutionists. 

It is not known generally today by academic historians that in 1770, the English "Constitution" did not mean what it does today. Today the English Constitution is known as whatever Parliament says it is. Not so in 1750, according to many lawyers on both sides of the Atlantic. Valid legal arguments were made that the English Constitution was a unwritten system of customary restraints on what the King and the governing body could do.

Consider Lord Camden. In 1766, he was Chief Justice of one of the central common law courts and about to become Lord Chancellor.. At that time he warned Parliament that there were steps, including taxing the American Colonies, that it could not take legally. Camden agreed with the theory of the Massachusetts lawyers: that the English Constitution was a system of customary restraints on what the King and the governing body could do. And that customary restraint made it legally improper to tax without the consent of the representatives of the English persons to be taxed. Lord Camden, "House of Lords Debate of 10 Feb 1766," in Parliamentary History (1766), 168....

http://www.bucklinsociety.net/1700-law-american.htm

My Activist path of the 2008 to the 2012 Primary eve in Iowa

When Newt dropped out in 2007, I found myself having to get active and vett candidates. When I ran into Governor Huckabee, it was like he had a recorder in my home repeating everything I had said.

Governor Huckaee would have been President had he not been bulldogged in SC debate. He has the Quest as his own. Then cam Cain, who too has the Quest in his Mission.

All during the past five years, I have spent a lot of time countering the lies about Ron Paul and the mediabot hate for him We must recognize the we are being divided on the right, leaving the Constitutionalists formed regardless of their State affiliation.

Paul has come to the top in a big way this year, being the only Constitutionalist standing in the top tier. Despite the thousands of cuts causing ferocity hazing, his Quest is the Constitution and fiscal repair. A week ago, I came to a pint that I said, done, no more vetting. Constitutionalist Paul has my support.

The Social Conservatives have defined Constitutional conduct as their number one plank. The anti-war crowd on the left are many. Momentum for the Constitutionalist will draw from the right and if it is Paul, he will sink Obama.

Should Paul fail to beat back the Nationalists and those who are not awake yet to it, then you can count on a third party. Sent Sarah a note to ready ready and to seek the Constitutionalist party ticket. Doctor Paul endorsed the Constitutionalist candidate in 2008. This may be the most interesting year of the century and we just got started. If we do well, we could see our future setting new standards in American Prosperity. If we go the wrong way, it will take most of the century to get anywhere and if liberty is involved.

FairTax will provide a GDP of way north of 10% per year for years to come and Constitutional conduct will create such a peace and tranquility, blessings will overflow.

When our Constitution was devised,it was a given that local governance was the norm, from the bottom up. If the local level could not do it, the next level up would. It was not question of convenience, but a matter of principle. Now we rule by decree rather then common law.

My Open Letter to Speaker Newt Gingrich~ 'Bringing Courts Back Under the Constitution'

Speaker Newt Gingrich,

In doing a quick review of, 'Bringing the Courts Back Under the Constitution', I found it a bit refreshing as the Patriot Stand on the Constitution.

As Alexander Hamilton stated in Federalist #78, the term in the U.S. Constitution,

"Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts,

shall hold their Offices during good Behavior",

points to the must of holding the interpretation of law to be the reasoning used to make it, without deference. This fundamental reasoning keeps in check the Beast on the chain, wanting to devour us, As Jefferson so clearly describes in the Declaration of Independence.

One must question what is not addressed, oligarchy abuse:

I. Commerce Clause;

II. Supremacy Clause;

III. General Welfare Clause;

IV. Imminent domain; etc.

How do you view these?  And what if the President abuse's the Presidency?

Your answers here will mean something, as well as answering why a closed border tax structure is used in open border trade?

If you are a Patriot, you will put 'We the People' First. What say you?

Do or die is Liberty's Cry! This election is this crossroad~

Constitutional conduct by Decree and FairTax will go a long, long way for Liberty's sake and for the sake of the Family.

Cordially,

Constitutionalist FairTax/999 Undecided

George

If everyone knew all there is to know, they would not do half the things they do, including myself, therefore I must foregive them, including myself.

My Open Letter to Speaker Newt Gingrich

Speaker Newt Gingrich,

In doing a quick review of, 'Bringing the Courts Back Under the Constitution', I found it a bit refreshing as the Patriot Stand on the Constitution.

As Alexander Hamilton stated in Federalist #78, the term in the U.S. Constitution,

 "Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts,

shall hold their Offices during good Behavior",

points to the must of holding the interpretation of law to be the reasoning used to make it, without deference. This fundamental reasoning keeps in check the Beast on the chain, wanting to devour us, As Jefferson so clearly describes in the Declaration of Independence.

One must question what is not addressed, oligarchy abuse:

I.    Commerce Clause;

II.   Supremacy Clause;

III.  General Welfare Clause;

IV. Imminent domain; etc.

  How do you view these? And what if the President abuse's the Presidency?

Your answers here will mean something, as well as answering why a closed border tax structure is used in open border trade?

If you are a Patriot, you will put 'We the People' First.  What say you? 

Do or die is Liberty's Cry! This election is this crossroad~

Constitutional conduct by Decree and FairTax will go a long, long way for Liberty's sake and for the sake of the Family.

Cordially,

Constitutionalist FairTax/999 Undecided,

George

If everyone knew all there is to know, they would not do half the things they do, including myself, therefore I must foregive them, including myself.