The path to saving America is not Mitt's as SSI needs replaced by jobs * Newt is

Romney wants to keep SSI in government so they can steal it again.  Not smart enough to realize what is coming so think tweaking by age will work, when the problem is the size of 67 Trillion set aside for the huge influx of baby boomers. 


Only full employment can sustain SSI and two other steps. We must make it so this misuse of our Treasure never happens again bu privatizing Federal Entitlements and end the handicap production tax which places the Federal tax burden into the price of our own product to ourself, let alone export.


We need to go to States allowing for IRAs with HSA Ryders to be an alternative to Federal entitlements and for The Federal Government to make a date certain no new entries into the system allowed and plan a transition to privatize all. I&HSA Plan spoken to by up Coming Congressman Don Volaric~


By putting healthcare under the pension plan replacing SSI, you provide the youth with a plan that provides healthcare immediately and it also lowers cost by the competitive nature that will result. Remember what Pope John Paul spoke to, how license is a form of slavery. Free up healthcare and let the grassroots control of self responsibility blossom into individual freedom. You can also make the Income & Health Savings Plan be locally invested as an option. 

Go to FairTax, vetted for 15 years and 22 Million in research and development to give we the people a 22% tax cut from our double taxation via production tax, done with only one benefit. Einstein would say something about this repetition of keeping the IRS. 

With workers investing in their local economy and American Product getting a 15% advantage with imports, we will get to full employment where employers will bid for your services.

Constitutional Scholar read Health Care Bill 3200="the most massive transfer of power to the Executive Branch of government "

Wed Dec 2, 2009 5:02 pm (PST)

 

Someone did read the entire House Bill 3200: The Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009

 

From Michael Connelly - Retired attorney,

Constitutional Law Instructor,

Carrollton, Texas

 

Well, I have done it! I have read the entire text of proposed House Bill 3200: The Affordable Health Care Choices Act of 2009. I studied it with particular emphasis from my area of expertise, constitutional law... I was frankly concerned that parts of the proposed law that were being discussed might be unconstitutional.

 

 What I found was far worse than what I had heard or expected.  To begin with, much of what has been said about the law and its implications is in fact true, despite what the Democrats and the media are saying.  The law does provide for rationing of health care, particularly where senior citizens and other classes of citizens are involved, free health care for illegal immigrants, free abortion services, and probably forced participation in abortions by members of the medical profession.

 

The Bill will also eventually force private insurance companies out of business and put everyone into a government run system. All decisions about personal health care will ultimately be made by federal bureaucrats and most of them will not be health care professionals. Hospital admissions, payments to physicians, and allocations of necessary medical devices will be strictly controlled.

 

However, as scary as all of that it, it just scratches the surface. In fact, I have concluded that this legislation really has no intention of providing affordable health care choices. Instead it is a convenient cover for the most massive transfer of power to the Executive Branch of government that has ever occurred, or even been contemplated. If this law or a similar one is adopted, major portions of the Constitution of the United States will effectively have been destroyed.

 

The first thing to go will be the masterfully crafted balance of power between the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches of the U.S. Government... The Congress will be transferring to the Obama Administration authority in a number of different areas over the lives of the American people and the businesses they own. The irony is that the Congress doesn't have any authority to legislate in most of those areas to begin with. I defy anyone to read the text of the U.S. Constitution and find any authority granted to the members of Congress to regulate health care.

 

This legislation also provides for access by the appointees of the Obama administration of all of your personal healthcare information, your personal financial information, and the information of your employer, physician, and hospital. All of this is a direct violation of the specific provisions of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution protecting against unreasonable searches and seizures. You can also forget about the right to privacy. That will have been legislated into oblivion regardless of what the 3rd and 4th Amendments may provide.

 

If you decide not to have healthcare insurance or if you have private insurance that is not deemed "acceptable" to the "Health Choices Administrator" appointed by Obama there will be a tax imposed on you. It is called a "tax" instead of a fine because of the intent to avoid application of the due process clause of the 5th Amendment.  However, that doesn't work because since there is nothing in the law that allows you to contest or appeal the imposition of the tax, it is definitely depriving someone of property without the "due process of law.

 

So, there are three of those pesky amendments that the far left hate so much out the original ten in the Bill of Rights that are effectively nullified by this law. It doesn't stop there though. The 9th Amendment  that provides: "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people;" The 10th Amendment states: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are preserved to  the States respectively, or to the people." Under the provisions of this piece of Congressional handiwork neither the people nor the states are going to have any rights or powers at all in many areas that once were theirs to control.

 

I could write many more pages about this legislation, but I think you get the idea. This is not about health care; it is about seizing power and limiting rights. Article 6 of the Constitution requires the members of both houses of Congress to "be bound by oath or affirmation" to support the Constitution. If I was a member of Congress I would not be able to vote for this legislation or anything like it without feeling I was violating that sacred oath or affirmation. If I voted for it anyway I would hope the American people would hold me accountable.

 

For those who might doubt the nature of this threat I suggest they consult the source. Here is a link to the Constitution:

 

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html

 

And another to the Bill of Rights:

 

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights_transcript.html

 

There you can see exactly what we are about to have taken from us.

 

Michael Connelly

Retired attorney,

Constitutional Law Instructor

Carrollton, Texas

 

***

below is authenticity of the above 

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Guy Holland

To: ronpaul-39@meetup.com

Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 3:09 AM

Subject: [ronpaul-39] Someone read the Health bill for Constitutionality

 

Dear Guy:

 

  Thank you for your inquiry. Yes, I did write this article. You can find the original on my website and blog as well as more recent articles I have written on the same subject matter. The link is below. You can also go to the "About" page of the website to view my credentials.

 

Best regards,

Michael

 

 

Michael Connelly Personal website and Blog http://michaelconnelly.viviti.com/  

 

Author of "The Mortarmen" a book about my father's unit in WWII;

"Riders in the Sky: The Ghosts and Legends of Philmont Scout Ranch" ;

and my just released novel "Amayehli: A Story of America".

  

I also teach law courses via the Internet through colleges and universities worldwide. To find a college or university near you, go to Education To Go's website at www.ed2go.com.

 

 

 

From: guyrex@comcast.net  

To: mrobertc@hotmail.com  

Subject: Re: Someone read the Health bill for Constitutionality  

Date: Sun, 6 Dec 2009 08:54:11 -0500

 

 Mr. Connelly,

 

 Before I circulate this, would you please confirm this as your handiwork?

 

 Thank you in advance for your assistance.

 

 Best regards,

 

 Guy

 

Guy R. Holland, CFP  

Tax & Financial Planning, since 1975  

10343 Tophill Drive  

Hartland, MI 48353 USA

 

 Telephone: 248-470-4916

 

 Vote Congress Out in 2010...  http://ThrowThemOut.com

 

 Join the R3VOLution  http://CampaignForLiberty.com

 

 

Health Care Fairy Tale

(my comment below)

July 23, 2009 - 04:27 PM

Health Care Fairy Tale

by Mike Huckabee

On Wednesday, President Obama held a news conference, which was designed to enlist public support for his universal healthcare plan. I think it is pretty safe to say that the President's remarks created more questions than he answered.

There isn't any question that there is a disconnect between the President and the American people on the issue of health care. Most Americans do not want government controlled health care. They do want lower costs.

Like most Americans, I find myself asking again and again, why the rush to adopt a national health care plan that will consume 1/6 of our federal budget? Isn't this an important issue that we should take our time on, debate fully all of the proposals being floated, and make sure that everyone, including our legislators, has a chance to read the bill?

The Obama Administration continues to say that the issue has been debated for years. That may or may not be true, but what is true is that the bills being proposed on Capitol Hill have not been debated!!! In fact, no one seems to know what is in them

The President cites as a reason for quick action, rising costs of health care. Yet even the Congressional Budget Office says the plans being offered will not decrease costs, and in fact, will increase them. Seems like a good time to get our figures straight before we try to pass any legislation...

***

my comment:

Time is our friend here.  Any attempt to push Health Care through by the House rules will be an affront to We the People.

Constitutionally, the control of Healthcare by the Federal Government is limited.  It cannot become as Medicare is.

The Feds can however unify the States by providing the framework for private of State system to impede the undue costs within Health care.  They can end lawsuits; make mandatory HSA/IRA for anyone under age of 50 (eventually replacing Social Security);

Socially, there is not any permission by the Constitution to allow Federal Health Care.  However, States can delve into it if their Constitution allows it.  It would behoove us to center on States converting their Health care for the disadvantaged to the HSA/IRA plans.

Details are what needs cleaned up.  The placing records online can be an invasion of privacy, but so is today's world.  Make data private property and streamline healthcare, stopping duplicate services and providing greater care.

We need to divest ourselves of Federal Social programs, not add to them.  The first settlers tried the commune approach of equal distribution and they nearly starved to death due to slackers not providing their fair share.  Don't end the American dream by doing the same here, ending the ability to get ahead.