A plan to fix our HealthCare System

President Bush established HSA (Health Savings Accounts) which work in unison with catastrophic health care plans.  They are a wonderful plan, especially for the young, as it establishes a savings plan that can reach the catastrophic deduction and be there when you need it, year after year.  Also, you can continue to add to this HSA as an IRA.

 

For those who are not able to afford health care, the cost of the HSA/IRA plan is much more affordable for the younger crowd.  If still unable to afford due to say the current tax system eliminating jobs, it is a State issue to cover you.  States would be wise to create an system with the HSA/IRA which will create a competitive approach, such as a % of the Catastrophic set aside by the State to those on assistance would go toward their IRA value to be available at retirement or for buying a home.

 

The Catastrophic healthcare plans also have built into them free preventive care like physicals & certain tests to prevent major complications before they set in.  It is a perfect way to cure our healthcare fiscal crisis.

 

The Federal Government has no business in being a nanny State.  Their guideline set by the Constitution is very limited.  If we continue to ignore the Constitution, you can kiss it goodbye and with it the liberty and freedom it has preserved.  But the Federal Government could set guidelines for interstate coverage that would mandate the use of HSA/IRA plans, but not if the Company is intra-state.

 

Check out this video by Governor Huckabee on how the current plan of President Obama will not be good to us.

http://my.huckpac.com/?Fuseaction=Blogs.View&Blog_id=2706

 

R. George Dunn

Urgent Action Alert: MI- Do Dillon and Cherry support Dems' radical ANTI-CHOICE legislation?

 

http://www.rightmichigan.com/story/2009/7/7/71022/61611

Urgent Action Alert: Do Dillon and Cherry support Dems' radical ANTI-CHOICE legislation?

"We don't think a pharmacist should sit in judgment on a prescription a doctor has prescribed and that is in their patient's best interests," Dem State Representative Rebekah Warren recently told a pro-abortion online resource publication.  

An early contender for the "most patently ridiculous quote of the year," Warren's embarrassing  attempt at quasi-ethical faux-reason was, apparently, an attempt to rationalize her support for House Bill 5164, legislation that ignores longstanding, bipartisan state and national standards and legally forces pharmacists to fill prescriptions for the "abortion pill" despite personal, moral or religious objections.

The bill is cosponsored by twenty-three other House Democrats.

Currently, health care workers, including the good folks who after a badly skinned knee fill the prescription for your child's antibiotics, are legally entitled to refuse to participate in procedures they object to ethically.  Like, say, killing kids.

That's not sitting "in judgment" of a doctor and a patient.  That's sitting in judgment of one's own conscience and actions, Representative.  

Unfortunately, that's not even the most insidious legislation just introduced by members of a political Party beholden above everything else to the multi-billion dollar abortion-on-demand industry.

Warren and twenty other House Democrats have also introduced House Bill 5158, effectively designed to drive crisis pregnancy centers out of business. The legislation creates fresh regulation that mandates each and every non-profit CPC in the state provide, in writing, information about where and how to acquire an abortion, including directions showing pregnant women how to get to the abortion clinic.

The real irony in all of this is just how patently ANTI-CHOICE each of these bills is.  Eliminating pharmacists' choice on whether or not to physically participate in a procedure they may consider anything from mildly objectionable to a mortal sin, all via government mandate and the threat of force doesn't exactly promote that whole "liberty" concept.

Meanwhile, the Crisis Pregnancy Center legislation is inarguably designed to force pro-life organizations to permanently close their doors, leaving hurting women with only one option... pro-abortion Planned Parenthood.

Each of the bills has been referred to the House Judiciary committee, chaired by Democrat Mark Meadows.  Meadows is the primary sponsor on the anti-CPC bill and a co-sponsor on the pharmacists-as-abortionists mandate.  We know where he stands.

There are two prominent Michigan Democrats whose opinion we still don't know, though.

House Speaker Andy Dillon, a man who has been endorsed by Michigan Right to Life in cycles past and one who is rumored to be considering a run at the Governor's office next year, has not commented publicly on the bills making their way through his chamber.

Similarly, Lieutenant Governor and 2010 Gubernatorial candidate John Cherry has been silent on his party's pro-abortion, anti-choice legislation.  

Michigan voters have a right to know where each of them stand.

Three listings follow.  No excuses.  Please find five minutes today... right now, on your lunch break, on the road in between meetings... whenever... and drop an email and CALL Mark Meadows, John Cherry and Andy Dillon.

Tell them what YOU think about the Democrats' anti-choice legislation, ask Meadows and Dillon to stop the insanity before it reaches the House floor and ask Andy Dillon and John Cherry whether or not they support their Party's shockingly anti-choice legislation, HBs 5158 and 5164.

Then swing back by and let everyone know what they said!

John Cherry

Phone: (517) 853-8050


Email: ltgovcherry@michigan.gov

Andy Dillon

Phone: (888) 737-3455


Email: andydillon@house.mi.gov

Mark Meadows

Phone: (517) 373-1786


Email: markmeadows@house.mi.gov

http://www.rightmichigan.com/story/2009/7/7/71022/61611

---

The real irony in all of this is just how patently ANTI-CHOICE each of these bills is.  Eliminating pharmacists' choice on whether or not to physically participate in a procedure they may consider anything from mildly objectionable to a mortal sin, all via government mandate and the threat of force doesn't exactly promote that whole "liberty" concept.

Michelle Bachmann~A National Patriot

(my comment below)

Washington Post

Eye Opener: GOP to Bachmann: End Census Boycott

Happy Thursday! (Even better: Happy Getaway Day!) At some point last month, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) said she would refuse to fill out anything more than the number of people in her household on her Census questionnaire. She argued that questions other than how many people live in her home are unconstitutional and feared that political groups, including ACORN, might try to sway final Census numbers.

Republican colleagues have now called her boycott illogical and illegal.

"Every elected representative in this country should feel a responsibility to encourage full participation in the census. To do otherwise is to advocate for a smaller share of federal funding for our constituents," Reps. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.), Lynn Westmoreland (R-Ga.) and John Mica (R-Fla.) said in a statement. The trio is members the House Census Oversight Subcommittee....

***

my comment:

 

IN the tyranny of Government, there comes a point to which a Government's unconstitutional conduct requires for it's citizens to not adhere to the enforcement of unlawful orders, but to stand up and resist.  Gandhi made salt that was illegal.  Michelle Bachmann defies unconstitutional census form taken by knowingly corrupt organization ACORN.  God Bless Michelle.

 

To those who hold the purse up as more important then principle, you know where you are going?

 

R. George Dunn